[Vision2020] Jus' When You Thought Things Couln't Get More Stupid . . .

[Tom Hansen]

Two things, Mr. Price -

1)  The South Hill Vista apartments are, in fact, state-owned housing.

2)  If residents of these state-owned dwellings are permitted to store
firearms and ammunition within these state-owned dwellings, there is
nothing to prevent residents of state-owned dorms (including those dorm
residents who habitually consume such copious amounts of alcohol as to
fall out of second-floor windows) from possessing and storing firearms and
ammunition within their dorm rooms.

And for the bonus round, might I add that the first fatality resulting
from this newly availed freedom may, subsequently, place the state (along
with the State Board of Education and UI President Duane Nellis) in court
once again . . . as defendents in a wrongful death lawsuit.

Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho





On Mon, January 24, 2011 7:11 pm, Wayne Price wrote:
> Paul,
>
> If we can agree that South Hill Vista, in one way or the other is in
> fact state housing, then I can't see how a rule waiving a fundamental
> Constitutional Right in order to live in that state housing will be held
> by the court(s) to pass Constitutional review.
>
> I worded it above specifically to look at the issue of waiving a
> fundamental Constitutional right to take out all the possible animus
> of what can be a "hot button" topic, and strictly look at it as a
> Constitutional issue. For example, can the University of Idaho, as a
> "state" entity require people to waive the right of search and seizure
> in a state owned residence?  IF the answer is yes, that would mean a
> law enforcement agency to enter University housing, in this case South
> Hill Vista, would NOT need a search warrant. Can we live with that?
>
>
>
> Wayne