[Vision2020] [Familial CORRECTION] Re: Say What?
Joe Campbell
philosopher.joe at gmail.com
Thu Jul 30 06:44:51 PDT 2009
I'm trying to correct your lies, that's all there is to it. And I'll
keep doing it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:58 AM, "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>
wrote:
> You sure do spend a considerable amount of your time "not trying to
> convince me of anything."
>
> Actually saying "I'm sorry" and saying every thing but are two
> decidedly different things. One is straight forward and honest
> (something BHO is quite unfamiliar with) and the other is most
> decidedly not. Also, just to set straight one more of your little
> mistakes, it was Gates who I said was behaving stupidly, not the prez.
>
> As to the jackass joke, did you have an unfortunate experience with
> a domesticated beast of burden in your youth? You seem somewhat
> fixated in a negative way on these noble and dependable barnyard
> stalwarts.
>
> Or could it be that this is just your sly, but clumsy way of
> whispering sweet nothings in my ear?
>
> g
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Joe Campbell
> To: the lockshop ; vision 2020
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] [Familial CORRECTION] Re: Say What?
>
> No. I'm relying on the fact that saying you're sorry and expressing
> regret are pretty much the same thing.
>
> And the 'jackass' comment was a joke, per you comment about Obama's
> 'stupidity.' Which is not to say that you aren't a jackass!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 29, 2009, at 10:42 PM, "the lockshop"
> <lockshop at pull.twcbc.com> wrote:
>
>> So, what you're trying to make fly is that rather then relying
>> on what was actually said (and not said) people should read between
>> the lines of what has been written by others reporting on the
>> topic? For someone who isn't trying to convince me of anything you
>> sure are putting in a lot of effort for no discernable result.
>>
>> g
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Joe Campbell
>> To: the lockshop
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] [Familial CORRECTION] Re: Say What?
>>
>> I never said he "apologized;" I said he said he was "sorry,"
>> meaning he regreted ramping the issue up. Folks can read the
>> article and judge for themselves. As the article notes, the
>> Cambridge police understood the call as an expression of regret and
>> the Washington Post and CNN used that term in their headlines about
>> this story. The only people who see things differently are you and
>> the radical right wingers who watch Fox. Of course that is why Fox
>> exists, so your views are not disturbed by the truth. Like I said,
>> I'm not trying to convince you of anything.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jul 29, 2009, at 6:04 PM, "the lockshop"
>> <lockshop at pull.twcbc.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks! I see you have come to your senses, done a little
>>> checking, and acknowlage that BHO has refused to appologise for
>>> his silly gaff.
>>>
>>> From the very first paragraph of your news item"
>>>
>>> "President Obama called the Cambridge police officer who arrested
>>> his friend, prominent Harvard University Professor Henry Louis
>>> Gates Jr., but did not go so far as to say he apologized to the
>>> sergeant for saying the police acted "stupidly" during the
>>> incident."
>>>
>>> The rest of the article pretty much bears out everything I have
>>> said over the course of the latest series of posts.
>>>
>>> I assume from the latest "jackass" remarks that having to admit
>>> that you were wrong (again) leaves you feeling out of sorts?
>>>
>>> g
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Joe Campbell" <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>
>>> To: "the lockshop" <lockshop at pull.twcbc.com>
>>> Cc: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>; "vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com
>>> >
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:53 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] [Familial CORRECTION] Re: Say What?
>>>
>>> Look here, jackass:
>>>
>>> http://abcnews.go.com/m/screen?id=8163051
>>>
>>> And "jackass" is not my word; I'm just redirecting it.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2009, at 4:45 PM, "the lockshop"
>>> <lockshop at pull.twcbc.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Since you made your erroneous, irrelavent, and quite frankly,
>>> absurd
>>> > comment
>>> > under the heading "g stated" followed by my remarks, I became
>>> > confused. I'm
>>> > sure that when Glenn Beck pops in to check out your opinion with
>>> > regard to
>>> > his comments he will be devastated by your shrewd logic
>>> and rhetorical
>>> > acumen.
>>> >
>>> > And I still fail to see how the hue of ones relatives determines
>>> ones
>>> > capacity for racism.
>>> >
>>> > g
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
>>> > To: "the lockshop" <lockshop at pull.twcbc.com>
>>> > Cc: "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>; "vision 2020"
>>> > <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:09 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] [Familial CORRECTION] Re: Say What?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Again, g, and for the final time . . .
>>> >>
>>> >> My statement concerning Obama's grandfater was in response to the
>>> >> comment
>>> >> made by Glenn Beck at the begining of this "Say What?" thread.
>>> It
>>> >> was, in
>>> >> no way aimed at you.
>>> >>
>>> >> However, just because you are paranoid doesb't mean that they
>>> >> AREN'T after
>>> >> you . . .
>>> >>
>>> >> Paranoia Self-Destroya.
>>> >>
>>> >> ENUFF SAID !!
>>> >>
>>> >> Seeya round town, Moscow.
>>> >>
>>> >> Tom Hansen
>>> >> Moscow, Idaho
>>> >>
>>> >>> rac·ism (rszm)
>>> >>> n.
>>> >>> 1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human
>>> >>> character or
>>> >>> ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
>>> >>> 2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ---
>>> >>> ---
>>> >>> ---
>>> >>> ---
>>> >>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>
>>> >>> racist adj. & n
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I seem to recall kicking off my comments on this topic by
>>> stating
>>> >>> that
>>> >>> "I
>>> >>> wouldn't go so far as to brand the POTUS a racist." Actually
>>> wrote
>>> >>> it
>>> >>> down.
>>> >>> That said, I don't see anything in the above definition that
>>> >>> disqualifies
>>> >>> anyone based on the color of their relatives skin. Where do you
>>> >>> come by
>>> >>> this
>>> >>> quaint notion?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> g
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > ---
>>> > ---
>>> > ---
>>> >
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> > Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.35/2270 - Release Date:
>>> > 07/29/09
>>> > 06:12:00
>>> >
>>> > =======================================================
>>> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>> > http://www.fsr.net
>>> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>> > =======================================================
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.35/2270 - Release Date:
>>> 07/29/09 06:12:00
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.35/2270 - Release Date:
>> 07/29/09 06:12:00
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090730/5e2be6c9/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list