[Vision2020] Latah Commission 'Shocked' By City's Action

[J Ford]

Nope, not her "orders" but her concurrence...by your own siting.   There 
being a difference, doncha know.



J  :]





>From: "Dan Carscallen" <areaman at moscow.com>
>To: "'Vision 2020'" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Latah Commission 'Shocked' By City's Action
>Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:13:47 -0800
>
>Bill says:
>"Fife made a mistake.  The Council was trying to mellow out this little
>turf
>war thing with the county and Fife threw gasoline on the fire.
>I agree that Fife needs to go."
>
>In my perusal of the article posted by Tom Hansen, I read the following:
>"The order came from City Attorney Randy Fife, apparently with Mayor
>Nancy Chaney's concurrence.  'I think it's in keeping with enforcing the
>city's laws,' she said earlier in the week, and she stood by the
>statement after the commission meeting."
>
>Then am I to understand that since Fife "needs to go", Mayor Chaney also
>"needs to go" since it is apparent he was acting under her orders, and
>since she stood by the statement?
>
>Just wanting clarification and wondering if the same standards of
>conduct apply.
>
>DC
>
>
>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
Laugh, share and connect with Windows Live Messenger 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline