[Vision2020] Guns and puppies

[Saundra Lund]

I read something about that, too.  I know there are always two sides to
every story, but I was disappointed at the roadblocks being thrown up
for such a worthy project.

With respect to guns in classrooms, a friend brought up what I thought
was an interesting point:  why don't professors have conscience clause
protection?  I mean, the GOP is all for conscience clauses in all kinds
of insane situations, so why don't they extend that to professors?  That
would actually make a lot more sense than all the arenas where the GOP
advocates them.

But, I guess that answers my own question, doesn't it:  it would make
sense, and making sense isn't a skill the "modern" GOP and TPers seem to
exhibit very often.


Saundra

On Sun, May 25, 2014, at 04:59 PM, Nielsen, Ralph (nielsen at uidaho.edu)
wrote:
> 
> I believe I read a couple of weeks ago that puppies-in-training for guide
> dogs will not be permitted in University of Idaho classrooms because they
> might become dangerous to the students.
> 
> How about a compromise here? Since guns will now be allowed in the same
> classrooms, couldn’t we depend on those students carrying guns to shoot
> any puppy that shows signs of becoming dangerous?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================