[Vision2020] Concerning the Government Shutdown . . .

Thu Oct 3 02:52:14 PDT 2013

This congress is the least productive congress since pre-WW2 with a favorable rating at or near ten percent.

House Speaker John Boehner has stated several times that "Jobs" is priority one in the House, yet the Veterans Jib Coros Act of 2012, which was defeated in the House, is the only jobs-oriented-legislation presented in the House since 2010 when the Tea Party reared its ugly head and Boehner became Speaker.

In the Senate, the Get Obama Party and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell are responsible for more filibusters than the Senate has seen in a long, long time, thus preventing any legislation unfavorable to the GOP from ever seeing the light of day.  Heck, Sen. Cruz filibustered last Thursday for twenty-one hours against cloture of a CR (clean resolution) budgeting the government.

The House GOP are the same idiots that claimed to be so dedicated to representing the people that they worked late into the night last Saturday attempting to pass a budget (and suspend the Affordable Care Act).  How soon people forget that Congress took a five-week paid vacation in August and convened for a lousy nine days in September.

JEESH!

Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .

"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)
http://www.MoscowCares.com

Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho

"There's room at the top they are telling you still 
But first you must learn how to smile as you kill 
If you want to be like the folks on the hill."

- John Lennon

> On Oct 2, 2013, at 11:30 PM, Scott Dredge <scooterd408 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Nick writes:
> <Obama will stand firm and the GOP will cave, and the Republican brand will be even more tarnished. I can't wait until the 2014 mid-terms. The GOP candidate for governor in Virginia will probably be the first causality of this anti-Obamacare madness. The election is next month and the Democrat was already slightly ahead. Bye, bye GOP House Majority; Hello, Demo Congress led by Obama,>
> 
> The size of gain needed by House Democrats in 2014 to take over majority would be historically unprecedented.  The party controlling the White House almost always loses Congressional seats and in that last century there have only been 3 midterm elections where the incumbent president has gained a slim number of house seats.  Bush gained 8 in 2002, Clinton gained 5 in 1998, and if this matters, FDR gained 9 in 1934.  Aside from that, the House losses have typically been steep with an average loss of 30 seats.  I think it's safe to say that barring any major unusual circumstances in 2014, the GOP will gain House seats and will also likely gain Senate seats.  The current shutdown will be a faded memory a year from now.
> 
> You may be right about the Virginia gubernatorial race since that one is only a month away.
> 
> -Scott
> 
> From: fotopro63 at hotmail.com
> To: lfalen at turbonet.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 04:55:17 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Concerning the Government Shutdown . . .
> 
> There is a very simple solution to make sure the program works:
> Require our fearless "leaders" to utilize it, along with the millions of peons they purport to "represent".
> In school we learned that in the eyes of the law, all Americans were equal. Obviously, some are more equal than others, to paraphrase "Animal Farm".
> I'm tired of these jackhats serving no one but their parties, big money sponsors and their own wallets. I would love nothing more than to see the Democratic and Republican parties destroyed and their leaders hung.
> 
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 05:49:28 +0200
> To: ngier006 at gmail.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
> From: lfalen at turbonet.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Concerning the Government Shutdown . . .
> 
> Nick
> You are asking se to comment on a plan I know nothing about. One feature of any program should be to make it portable. It should go with the person not be tied to the company.
> Roger
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Vision2020] Concerning the Government Shutdown . . .
> From: "Nicholas Gier" 
> To: lfalen , vision2020 
> Date: 10/03/13 05:31:54
> 
> Hi Roger,
> 
> Show me how the people in Mass. are being "hurt" by a plan almost identical to Obamacare. How can people, who have had no insurance, be "hurt" by having health coverage that everyone can afford because there will be subsidies of those that cannot? These people can only be helped by the better health and peace of mind that uninterupted, full coverage will provide. For years many workers have stayed in jobs they hate because they do not want to lose their insurance.
> 
> The GOP keeps forgetting that their own CBO predicts that Obamacare will not increase the deficit. They also forget that their hero Ronald Reagan was initially against Medicare, and even some Tea Partiers like those checks, even though some of them don't realize that it is government program.
> 
> Obamacare is complex and clumsy because the health insurance lobby was so well entrenched, so, contrary to Sue Hovey's prediction, we will forever contend with an inefficient multi-payer insurance plans instead of the well tested, much more efficient single payer plans.  We will never match the lower costs and better health results of these long-running systems. Not with health care executives averaging $12 million a year and flying around in Learjets.
> 
> During the 1950s we had a good chance to get health care right, but we passed it by.
> 
> Nick
>  
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:03 PM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
>  
> Nick
> Not so. I said that they were all responsible. Nowhere did I explicitly say that I favored a one year delay. I said that if it were delayed for Big Business and Labor Unions then it should be for everyone. Otherwise make it applicable to everyone included in the original bill. It is not my plan. As for people having to wait if it were postponed, more people may be hurt as it presently. Business are dropping coverage and it will probably cost people more to get coverage on their own. People are also being hurt by business reducing their employees to part to time to avoid coverage. No matter how you slice it people are going to be hurt.
> A year may not be the appropriate trial time. But while there there are legitimate things that need fixed. Obamacare has flaws that need to be fixed. These can be addressed as they become more apparent.
> You may very well be right that the GOP will be blamed and that it will result in democratic wins.
> Roger
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Nicholas Gier" <ngier006 at gmail.com>
> To: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>, vision2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Date: 10/02/13 17:38
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Vision2020] Concerning the Government Shutdown . . .
> 
> Hi Roger,
> 
> The first sentence of your second paragraph makes it very clear that you favor delaying Obamacare for a year, unless you get your way on "fairness" which, as I argued, is a phony issue. Let me ask you once again: Do you think it is fair that those without insurance will have to wait a year under your plan? Please give us all an answer.
> 
> Furthermore, according to your new proviso, is it fair that after having coverage for first time, it will be cancelled after one year if it doesn't work? Who gets to determine that? That means a GOP Congress would get to rewrite Obamacare? You can't be serious.
> 
> The best indicator of the success of Obamacare is RomneyCare, which has holes in it that Obamacare will cover. The result will be that the People's Republic of Mass. will have the 100 percent coverage that every other civilized country in the world has. Health care costs have slowed more in Mass. than any other state.
> 
> The other result will be that the health of people in the Blue States, which is already better than the Red States, will improve, and the health of those in Red States that put hurdles up for implementation of Obamacare will get worse. Isn't ideology wonderful!
> 
> Obama will stand firm and the GOP will cave, and the Republican brand will be even more tarnished. I can't wait until the 2014 mid-terms. The GOP candidate for governor in Virginia will probably be the first causality of this anti-Obamacare madness. The election is next month and the Democrat was already slightly ahead.
> 
> Bye, bye GOP House Majority; Hello, Demo Congress led by Obama,
> 
> Nick
>  
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:06 PM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
>  
> Scott
> I think that a lawsuit will be filed. The problem is that it will take a year or so to go through the sysem. When any law is passed and signed by the pesident, he has a duty to enforce it as written, not pick and choose those portions he likes.
> 
> Nick
> You are reading a lot into my comments that I did not say. Unlike you, I am not defending either side. I think that Obamacare should be funded and apply to everyone covered in the original bill for one year. It should be sunset for one year. If it works fine, if not it is thrown out.
> Roger
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Scott Dredge" <scooterd408 at hotmail.com>
> To: "Nicholas Gier" <ngier006 at gmail.com>, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> Cc: viz <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Date: 10/02/13 13:55
> Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Concerning the Government Shutdown . . .
> 
> FIrst off, I agree with everyone Nick has written.
> 
> As for Roger's comment:
> <What needs to be done but won't be is either that that Obamacare is delayed for a year for everyone or that everyone is subject to the law now. Big business, labor unions and congress should all be subject to the law at the same time.>
> 
> Everyone is subject to the same law. In short, the law requires (I believe) everyone to be covered since everyone is a liability. Those working for big business, labor unions, and in Congress have insurance coverage. There is no reason to force them over to Obamacare unless they themselves opt out from their organizations health care plan and would otherwise represent an uncovered liability. I've heard this same argument about everyone being forced over to Obamacare on right wing radio. It's bogus and it's simply a ploy the Republicans to try and weaken Obamacare and as Nick points out, isn't it funny all of the sudden that the free market Republicans now want 'equality' for everyone.
> 
> Roger continues:
> <I believe it is unconstitutiionzl for Obama to let some people of the hook. He does not have the constitutional authority to decide on his own who to apply it to and who gets a delay.>
> 
> If it is indeed unconstitutional then you should be jumping for joy since a simple lawsuit run up the flagpole to the Supremes could quickly smash this to bits and at the same time validate your belief of unconstitutionality. Good luck with that. I think this statement is should be filed in the category of 'blowing smoke'.
> 
> -Scott
> 
> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:09:57 -0700
> From: ngier006 at gmail.com
> To: lfalen at turbonet.com
> CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Concerning the Government Shutdown . . .
> 
> Hi Roger,
> 
> This whole idea of "fairness" is bogus, especially for a party whose members say to all us "bleeding hearts": "Life is unfair." I say that more taxes on super rich is "fair," but the GOP says it's not. I like my idea of equity better than yours.
> 
> Even hundreds of GOP congressional aides rose up and said "Unfair!" when their employers tried to strip them their government health plans. They saw how phony this charade is. Thanks to the Great Goddess, who is always fair, the majority of your sad party refused to do it.
> 
> Except for some computer problems, the individual mandate is ready to go, none too late, for millions of people without coverage. Such as a friend's sister with cancer who was arbitrarily kicked off Medicaid. She will now have coverage, no questions asked. I ask you: Is it fair, if you had your way, that millions of uninsured will not be able to sign up in the exchanges??? I can't believe that you would answer Yes.
> 
> The situation with employer coverage is very different, and some fixes are begging to be made. Already employee hours are being cynically cut because their bosses don't want to cover them. Thanks to the individual mandate--a conservative idea by the way--they can find their own coverage on the exchanges. Your charge that the delay for employer coverage is "unconstitutional" is absurd.
> 
> Your history lesson is misguided. After piling up debt year after year (finally tripling it, primarily in an unnecessary escalation of the Cold War), Reagan was never threatened by the Democrats not to extend the debt limit. They never attached "do or die" amendments to their budget proposals. They made of their budgets, passed them on time, with Reagan's approval. The current GOP has blocked every single budget compromise (spending cuts contingent on modest tax increases). It's the GOP's fault that there is no budget.
> 
> If Reagan were here today, he would agree with your 2008 GOP presidential candidate John McCain: this Tea Party madness must stop. Reagan would certainly not agree with your defense of this egregious, terrorist-like obstruction of government.
> 
> I challenge you to call your GOP representatives and relay McCain's message to them. Even Boehner did not want this to happen, but he caved into his radical right. He will eventually have to come back and drop this insane Obamacare provision. The number of House Republicans ready to do this is growing day by day. They know very well that Obama will not give in to blackmail and extortion.
> 
> Roger, I can't believe you really want to be left standing on the extreme, extreme right. You don't do it locally, and you should not do it nationally.
> Why the inconsistency?
> 
> Eagerly waiting and wishing for the GOP, particularly its cowardly House Speaker, to come to its senses, or collapse under the weight of own irrationality and stupidity,
> 
> Nick
> 
>  
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
> The shutdown will hurt a lot of people. Most people live paycheck to paycheck. They have bills to pay. Also some people who need medical care may not be able to get it.
> 
> What needs to be done but won't be is either that that Obamacare is delayed for a year for everyone or that everyone is subject to the law now. Big business, labor unions and congress should all be subject to the law at the same time. I believe it is unconstitutiionzl for Obama to let some people of the hook. He does not have the constitutional authority to decide on his own who to apply it to and who gets a delay.
> The Democrats and the lamestream media are doing their best to blame the shutdown on the Republicans and they will probably get away with it. But it is not so. They are all responsible. The Democrats say that the Republicans wont deal unless they get their way on Obamacare. But the Democrats are just as recalcitrant. the House has sent a variety of different bills to the Senate and they have rejected them all. Now the House is sending over bills to fund various portions of the government and the Senate seems bound and determined to reject these. So just who is responsible for the continued shutdown. I long for the the days of Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neil.
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
> To: "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Date: 10/02/13 10:46
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Concerning the Government Shutdown . . .
> 
>  
> "In the event of a shutdown, stateside commissaries, including Alaska and Hawaii, will be open for a full business day on Oct. 1 to reduce the amount of perishables on-hand before beginning a systematic closure process to account for unsold products and secure facilities.
> Jeu recommends that customers stay tuned in to their local news outlets for information about any impact to services on their installations.
>  
> During a shutdown, commissary customers should be able to access the DeCA website. However, that site and the agency's social media platforms - Facebook, Twitter and other sites - would not be updated after Oct. 1 until the shutdown is over. Customers should be able to access the Department of Defense website, and its social media platforms for any updated information and breaking news that affects service members and federal government civilian employees."
> Source:
> http://www.commissaries.com/press_room/press_release/2013/DeCA_67_13.cfm
>  
> Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .
> 
> "Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)
> http://www.MoscowCares.com
>  
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
> "There's room at the top they are telling you still  
> But first you must learn how to smile as you kill 
> If you want to be like the folks on the hill." 
> 
> - John Lennon
>  
>  
> 
>  
>  
>  
> 
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> Although the Military Pay Act was passed and signed virtually seconds before midnight Monday, thus ensuring that our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines will continue to be paid . . .
> 
> Commissaries on military installations, funded by the Department of Defense budget, closed their doors yesterday morning. This may not be much of an inconvenience to Installations like Fort Benning (Columbus, Georgia is just outside the main gate) or Fort Dix (Wrightstown, New Jersey is just outside its main gate).  
> 
> But, when the commissary at Fort Irwin (home of the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, 916th Support Brigade, and the National Training Center Operations Group), suddenly the nearest location for grocery shopping became Barstow, California . . . 45 (that's right, FORTY-FIVE) MILES AWAY.
> 
> I'm guessing that there is not one member of congress who suddenly had that inconvenience thrust upon them!
>  
> 
> Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .
> 
> "Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)
> http://www.MoscowCares.com
>  
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
> "There's room at the top they are telling you still  
> But first you must learn how to smile as you kill 
> If you want to be like the folks on the hill." 
> 
> - John Lennon
>  
>  
> 
>  
>  
>  
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> ======================================================= 
>  
>  
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>  
> 
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ======================================================= List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com =======================================================
>  
>  
>  
> 
>  
>  
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ======================================================= List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com =======================================================
> 
> ======================================================= List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com =======================================================
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20131003/2d320288/attachment-0001.html>