[Vision2020] Why do we need immigration reform?

[Wayne Price]

Scott,

I agree that the US needs, and in my opinion, HAS a system  that is a clear, fair, and realistic path to citizenship.
What I object to is that the first "act" in the United States that illegal immigrants commit is a crime, by the very act of stepping across the border illegally, and it is the perception that little if anything is being done  to catch, prosecute and deport those that have entered illegally. (See 8 USC 1325)

Before I would support any type of "immigration reform", I want to see the current laws enforced.  The American people were taken in once by "immigration reform" back under Regan. The line was drawn in sand by that law, The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (Pub. L.  99-603;  100 Stat. 3359).  That Act legalized illegal immigrants who entered the United States before January 1, 1982 and had resided there continuously with the penalty of a fine, back taxes due, and admission of guilt. About three million undocumented immigrants were granted legal status. And what has happened since? 

Wayne 
  



On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Donovan Arnold wrote:

> Scott,
>  
> You are for a working slave class. I don't want that in the United States, it is unconstitutional and immoral. I do not believe in taxation without representation. I don't believe in working classes of people based on race, or nation of origin. I think the US should come up with a clear, fair, and realistic path to citizenship. "But I also don't see those engaging in 'hard labor' as pushing for 'livible wages' or the right to vote." You must have your eyes closed then.
>  
> Donovan J. Arnold
> 
> From: Scott Dredge <scooterd408 at hotmail.com>
> To: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>; viz <vision2020 at moscow.com> 
> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 11:16 AM
> Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Why do we need immigration reform?
> <So you want a return of slavery?>No.  I'm asking what are the problems presently with the status quo and asking for a justification of why any of it needs to be 'reformed'.<Hard labor without a liveable wage and no right to vote?>I don't want this.  But I also don't see those engaging in 'hard labor' as pushing for 'livible wages' or the right to vote.  If we're talking about migrant farm workers, they are represented in some fashion I think by the UFW.  Also, I believe they're getting more opportunity in the US even being 'undocumented' than would be getting in their native land.  Otherwise, they would just go back home.<Taxation without any representation?>How so?  Green Carders = United States Permanent Residents.  They are taxed at the same rates as full citizens.  Do you think they should be not taxed in any form since they don't have voting rights?  I don't think so.  They have the option to pursue full citizenship to get voting rights if they so choose.<Why don't we instead make it so millionaires cannot vote, run for office, or donate to any campaigns?>Because this would be unconstitutional.-Scott
> Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:03:21 -0700From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.comSubject: Re: [Vision2020] Why do we need immigration reform?To: vision2020 at moscow.com; scooterd408 at hotmail.com
> So you want a return of slavery? Hard labor without a liveable wage and no right to vote? Taxation without any representation? Why don't we instead make it so millionaires cannot vote, run for office, or donate to any campaigns? 
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
> From: Scott Dredge <scooterd408 at hotmail.com>; To: viz <vision2020 at moscow.com>; Subject: [Vision2020] Why do we need immigration reform? Sent: Sun, Jul 28, 2013 5:53:31 PM
> Hi all,I haven't followed the brouhaha regarding immigration reform.  What exactly are the problems that are at issue?  We already have a vast array of student and work visas that could be leveraged IMO.  Beyond that, it's obvious that the more immigrants that achieve full citizenship will be voting for the Democrats.  Thus, a good middle ground would be a path to Green Card which provides most rights except for voting rights.  Green Carders might like that even better since they'd not need to be burdened by the civic duty of sitting on a jury.-Scott
>  
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130729/239d5977/attachment.html>