[Vision2020] Vision2020 Digest, Vol 85, Issue 95

[Keely Emerine-Mix]

I lament the fact that my having an opinion that is different from yours makes me "self righteous."  Calling your comments "stupid" might not be the most righteous thing I've done this week, but it's what I think.  If I erred, I erred in ascribing inanity to you, not evil.  There IS a distinction, and I always like to give someone the benefit of the doubt.  I've never found you to be an evil man, and I haven't ever thought you to be a stupid one.  What you wrote, however, was shameful.  I'm quite sure you can deal with my thinking so.

You wrote:
"Zimmerman's decisions may have been ill considered (following on foot if
 that is in fact what he did) but legal. Martin's decision to leap out 
of the bushes and assault a stranger instead of simply continuing on the
 seventy yard to his fathers girlfriends home was not."

I truly mourn that you could write a paragraph, in analysis of the Zimmerman case, wherein you suggest -- groundlessly -- that the dead kid's actions in jumping out of a bush to assault the man who eventually shot and killed him were "illegal," as opposed to what you affirm is the legality of Zimmerman's actions.  No one knows that Trayvon Martin jumped out of the bushes to harm the armed man who was stalking him in direct disobedience of the Police Department's orders, and who was not only armed but who was a decade older and some 50 lbs. heavier.  If that scenario has lodged itself in your brain and those of others around you, I can assure you that it would not be the first time a guy who did something very bad, with the witness dead by his hand, conjured up a story more favorable than what happened -- or even what appeared to happen -- and got other folks to believe it.  Bottom line, Gary, your contribution to this discussion was to say that the victim did something illegal and the assailant didn't.  
Unless you were there, tell me how you know.  There is real horror in your suggestion that the kid shot to death in his own neighborhood somehow contributed to it by doing something, in your words, that was illegal.  And from all the way up here on my moral, emotional high horse, I can tell you that stinks to high heaven.

I may be the only one there tomorrow at 6 o'something at the Square to protest the verdict and the injustice of our justice system, but that's OK.  I can promise you that I don't mind one bit looking silly and emotional and self-righteous when the alternative is silence in the face of a great wrong.  

Keely


www.keely-prevailingwinds.com


Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:18:08 -0700
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Vision2020 Digest, Vol 85, Issue 95
From: moscowlocksmith at gmail.com
To: siyocreo at live.com

Civil and thoughtful what? Display of poorly focused emotional editorializing? Perhaps you would be able to climb down from horse on high to point out my factual errors rather then trying to simply be insulting. Second thought, don't

bother. To attempting to pit the facts verses your feelings,imagination, and your grossly overdeveloped sense of self righteousness is sure to be the very definition of time ill spent.

 g 

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Keely Emerine-Mix <siyocreo at live.com> wrote:




I'm going to briefly abandon my attempts to civil and thoughtful for a moment and say, Gary, the only thing that I can muster in regard to your final paragraph:


That's the most bizarre, facile, intellectually dishonest and frankly stupid analysis of this whole travesty I've ever heard.  

Keely



www.keely-prevailingwinds.com



Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 06:51:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Vision2020 Digest, Vol 85, Issue 95
From: moscowlocksmith at gmail.com

To: philosopher.joe at gmail.com
CC: lfalen at turbonet.com; vision2020 at moscow.com; siyocreo at live.com


I very strongly suspect that the likelihood of being jumped and beaten by one of the local seventeen year olds would be vanishingly small to the point that to bet otherwise would be to throw away cash.

 I have to imagine that it's fun for some to endlessly bang away at the "stalked the poor child" narrative but, an equally valid perspective would be that Zimmerman was performing a public service to his community by being involved in a neighborhood watch program and was in no way attempting to be surreptitious or covert in his attention to Martin's presence.

 Poor decisions were made by both Zimmerman and Martin. Zimmerman's decisions may have been ill considered (following on foot if that is in fact what he did) but legal. Martin's decision to leap out of the bushes and assault a stranger instead of simply continuing on the seventy yard to his fathers girlfriends home was not.

  g

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com> wrote:


The best point to make is not that Zimmerman was racist, or that the jurors were racist. There is no basis for either assertion.


That doesn't mean the case isn't symptomatic of a kind of persistent institutionalized racism. You say first reports were that Zimmerman attacked an unarmed kid. But that report turned out to be false.


How is it false? He was 17 and unarmed. Say what you want but Zimmerman stalked then shot and killed an unarmed 17-year-old boy who was merely walking around his own neighborhood. How could you not feel outrage? 


Why don't you drive around the streets of Moscow and follow all the 17-year-old kids you see. See what happens. There seems to be a kind of wreckless negligence on the part of Zimmerman, if nothing else.


On Jul 17, 2013, at 6:27 PM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:




Just a few comments.From the first reports out it appeared that Zimmerman had unjustly attacked and unarmed kid. A picture was shown of a 12 year old Trayvon.  This report turned out to be false. Ziommerman is not a monster or a saint. He was a mentor for black kids and he took a black girl to the prom. He obviously is not a racist. This was an unfortunate event where both have some responsibility. We are a nation of laws. On the bases of the evidence, the jury had no choice but to acquit. There have been many cases where whites has have killed blacks due to racial hatred and they should have been executed for it. Just two example are Emmett Till and the three Civil Rights workers.  This case is entirely different.

Roger
-----Original Message-----


From: "Paul Rumelhart" <godshatter at yahoo.com>
To: "Saundra Lund" <v2020 at ssl1.fastmail.fm>


Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com, "Keely Emerine-Mix" <siyocreo at live.com>
Date: 07/15/13 18:29


Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Vision2020 Digest, Vol 85, Issue 95









A few points.

On 07/15/2013 05:36 PM, Saundra Lund wrote:
 

No, Paul – you are missing the point.  Make as many excuses about Zimmerman’s “recklessness” as you want, but that doesn’t change the fact that an innocent child who was doing nothing wrong is now dead because he (Trayvon) decided to exercise his right to defind himself against the deadly menace named George Zimmerman.




 

 

Make no mistake about it:  Zimmerman was stalking this child the way a cat stalks a bird.

 

In Zimmerman's version of events, he was trying to keep tabs on him until the police got there.

 

 

And, make no mistake about it:  Trayvon Martin’s death was unjust.  It is absolutely unjust when an innocent child doing not a thing in the world wrong winds up dead because a nut with an indisputable chip on his shoulder has a gun, and the injustice is further magnified when the killer escapes punishment.


 

He was acquitted in a court of law, because there wasn't enough evidence to convict him.  So what do you propose?  Throw the rule of law aside for this one case where you're sure he's guilty somehow?



 

 

Trayvon had every right to “stand his ground” against a gun-carrying whacko who had already been told by LE not to follow the victim.  Any man, woman, or child of any color with connected brain cells would feel threatened being stalked at night by an unknown dangerous creep like Zimmerman.


 

Martin had no way of knowing that Zimmerman had a gun, and didn't find out until after he was fighting him.

 

 

And, if you don’t Get why folks are rightly upset that a monster like Zimmerman gets a free criminal pass for killing an innocent child and why they want to organize a vigil – or millions of vigils -- in Trayvon Martin’s honor, then I don’t know what to say other than I pity you and your lack of humanity.


 

You have the nerve to call Zimmerman a "monster", and berate me for being subjective at the same time?  And why do you always assume that if I disagree with you that I "lack humanity"?  I know myself, and could give a crap if you know how much "humanity" I have.



 

 

Finally, why don’t you just give it a rest?  Your biased explanation of why you felt the verdict was just was fine & mildly interesting, even though you included a lot of subjective speculation supporting your bias I guess you hoped we’d miss (LOL – too bad for you, I didn’t miss your selective subjectivity).


 

I'm getting the idea that "bias" means "disagrees with Saundra", but I could be wrong.

 

 

But, how about losing the arrogance that makes you think causes you don’t care about aren’t worthy, and how about losing the hubris that makes you think it appropriate to tell others where they should be directing their energies?  If you want to organize or get out there & protest for your list of causes, have at it!  No one is stopping you or suggesting you should be directing your focus elsewhere.


 

Just trying to inject a little rationality into what appears to be yet another witch hunt.  A pastime I find enjoyable sometimes.

 

 

Why, then, you do feel the need to chide others who do care – and care deeply – about the completely preventable tragic death of an innocent child at the hands of a lunatic vigilante?


 

That death could have been prevented two ways.  Zimmerman could have left him alone after he'd done his job, and Martin could have not fought him.  It's one of those real-life thingys where it's never as black and white (no pun intended) as people would like to believe.



Paul

 

 

 

Saundra

 

 

From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Paul Rumelhart


Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:37 PM
To: Keely Emerine-Mix; vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Vision2020 Digest, Vol 85, Issue 95



 


The problem as I see it, Keely, is that you want it to be an injustice.  You want it to be about the innocent black kid that was gunned down by the armed white man for no reason other than he was black.  Facts to the contrary be damned.  It's a nice story, but just remember that that's what it is: a story.



Paul
 
 



From: Keely Emerine-Mix <siyocreo at live.com>


To: "vision2020 at moscow.com" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:10 PM


Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Vision2020 Digest, Vol 85, Issue 95 

 

Tom, be there Friday at 6, tell everyone you know, bring whatever microphone you can, and I'll see you there.  I don't care how many people show up.  I care very much that I myself not be silent in the face of such an injustice.



Keely
 


www.keely-prevailingwinds.com


> From: vision2020-request at moscow.com
> Subject: Vision2020 Digest, Vol 85, Issue 95

> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:44:08 -0700
>
> Send Vision2020 mailing list submissions to
> vision2020 at moscow.com


>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/vision2020
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to


> vision2020-request at moscow.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> vision2020-owner at moscow.com


>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Vision2020 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Trayvon Martin rally? (Tom Hansen)


> 2. Re: Trayvon Martin rally? (Scott Dredge)
> 3. Re: Trayvon Martin rally? (Paul Rumelhart)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1


> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:28:21 -0700
> From: Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>
> To: Keely Emerine-Mix <siyocreo at live.com>


> Cc: "vision2020 at moscow.com" <vision2020 at moscow.com>, Jeanne McHale
> <jeannemchale at hotmail.com>, Fritz Knorr <fritzknorr at gmail.com>, LGBTQA


> Office <lgbtoffice at uidaho.edu>, "UI Human Rights, Access & Inclusion"
> <csuarez at uidaho.edu>


> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Trayvon Martin rally?
> Message-ID: <21BCEC70-D46E-4829-B922-24FA74223826 at moscow.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


>
> I am with you 1,000,000,000 . . . %, Keely.
>
> Please let me know what I, or Moscow Cares, can do to make this rally a reality, and consider it done.
>
> Come on, V-Peeps. GIVE A DAMN !


>
> Seeya 'round town, Moscow, because . . .
>
> "Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)
> http://www.MoscowCares.com


>
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
>
> "There's room at the top they are telling you still
> But first you must learn how to smile as you kill
> If you want to be like the folks on the hill."


>
> - John Lennon
>
>
>
> On Jul 15, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Keely Emerine-Mix <siyocreo at live.com> wrote:
>
> > Visionaires,


> >
> > I've been out of town for two weeks so I don't know if there's a rally or anything scheduled on the Palouse in support of the Trayvon Martin family and to express outrage at the verdict. If not, I'd suggest 6 p.m. Friday at Friendship Square. Please either inform me of something previously planned, or pass this around. I'd be willing to speak and I know others of you would, too.


> >
> > This saddens and angers me beyond measure. We have to speak out.
> >
> > Love,
> > Keely
> >
> >
> >
> > www.keely-prevailingwinds.com


> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > http://www.fsr.net


> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...


> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130715/d017910d/attachment-0001.html>


>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:31:27 -0600
> From: Scott Dredge <scooterd408 at hotmail.com>


> To: Keely Emerine-Mix <siyocreo at live.com>, viz <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Trayvon Martin rally?


> Message-ID: <BLU175-W9CE824D6AE4D362F4DE8BE4670 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>


> What would be the point? It was very controversial to bring George Zimmerman to trial in the first place. He was acquitted. Not even a hung jury. Outright full acquittal.
>
> I hate sounding like a broken record but for whatever reason I can't seem to get a basic point across that ***we do not have system of mob rule***. If we did, Zimmerman would have already been lynched without due process long ago. Would that be less of an outrage?


>
> -Scott
>
> From: siyocreo at live.com
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:18:06 -0700


> Subject: [Vision2020] Trayvon Martin rally?
>
>
>
>
> Visionaires,
>
> I've been out of town for two weeks so I don't know if there's a rally or anything scheduled on the Palouse in support of the Trayvon Martin family and to express outrage at the verdict. If not, I'd suggest 6 p.m. Friday at Friendship Square. Please either inform me of something previously planned, or pass this around. I'd be willing to speak and I know others of you would, too.


>
> This saddens and angers me beyond measure. We have to speak out.
>
> Love,
> Keely
>
>
> www.keely-prevailingwinds.com


>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net


> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...


> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130715/1eb6f330/attachment-0001.html>


>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com>


> To: Keely Emerine-Mix <siyocreo at live.com>, "vision2020 at moscow.com"
> <vision2020 at moscow.com>


> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Trayvon Martin rally?
> Message-ID:
> <1373913845.39333.YahooMailNeo at web163602.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>


> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Keely,
>
> Did you look at the evidence?? I don't see how the jury could have done any differently.? Zimmerman was using the "self-defense" defense, and there was enough evidence of that to provide reasonable doubt (his injuries, the witness who saw the guy in the white sweater beating on the guy in the red sweater, the inability to determine who was shouting for help).? According to Zimmerman, Martin saw his weapon and they fought for it and Zimmerman ended up shooting him in the chest.? Since Martin isn't around to give his side of events (conveniently, I know) and since there is no evidence to disprove this, they pretty much had to acquit.? In my opinion, of course.? To prove second degree murder, they would have to disprove the self-defense defense and show that he was unhinged enough to take this opportunity to go kill Martin.? I haven't seen any evidence of that, either.


>
>
> The media has worked hard to make this about race, but there was no indication I saw that Zimmerman was racially motivated.? If anything, Martin was the one framing everything by race.? NBC had to resort to editing the 9-1-1 tape to make it look like it was racially motivated, but the real 9-1-1 tape doesn't appear to show this (at least what I've heard of it).?


>
>
> If you want to get out there and protest something, I recommend protesting what NBC did when editing the 9-1-1 tape in an attempt to ignite racial tensions.? Or protest what the NSA has been doing.? Or protest the drone strikes or the secret courts or the secret reasoning for gathering information on everyone that can't be revealed.? Or protest how the US is going after Snowden so hard instead of cleaning house.?


>
>
> Don't be distracted by this media circus.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Keely Emerine-Mix <siyocreo at live.com>


> To: "vision2020 at moscow.com" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:18 AM


> Subject: [Vision2020] Trayvon Martin rally?
>
>
>
>
> Visionaires,
>
> I've been out of town for two weeks so I don't know if there's a rally or anything scheduled on the Palouse in support of the Trayvon Martin family and to express outrage at the verdict.? If not, I'd suggest 6 p.m. Friday at Friendship Square.? Please either inform me of something previously planned, or pass this around.? I'd be willing to speak and I know others of you would, too.


>
> This saddens and angers me beyond measure.? We have to speak out.
>
> Love,
> Keely
>
>
>
> www.keely-prevailingwinds.com


>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? http://www.fsr.net


> ? ? ? ? ? mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...


> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130715/032dbdad/attachment.html>


>
> ------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.


> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================


>
> End of Vision2020 Digest, Vol 85, Issue 95
> ****************************************** 

=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.

              http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

    


=======================================================

 List services made available by First Step Internet,

 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.

               http://www.fsr.net

          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com

=======================================================



=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.


               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================


=======================================================

 List services made available by First Step Internet,

 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.

               http://www.fsr.net

          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com

=======================================================

 		 	   		  

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130718/c6906990/attachment-0001.html>