[Vision2020] The Latest on Bustamante . . .

[Tom Hansen]

Wayne -

Concerning the "redact" thing, I was jus' bein' sarcastic, ok?

But, if you listen real closely, you can almost hear the document shredders over at the admin building.

Seeya round town, Moscow.

Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho

"Honest and true,
As the morning star.
Vote for just two,
Ament and Lamar."

On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:17 AM, "Art Deco" <deco at moscow.com> wrote:

> I haven't read the judge's decision in this case, but why do the records need to be redacted?  Were such reactions allowed under the decision?  I am afraid the baby is going to be thrown out with the bathwater.
>  
> w.
> 
> From: Tom Hansen
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 8:07 AM
> To: Moscow Vision 2020
> Subject: [Vision2020] The Latest on Bustamante . . .
> 
> . . . was back on October 3rd when Judge Stegner ruled that UI must publicly release records of Bustamante.
> 
> http://www.khq.com/story/15603625/media-outlets-seek-release-of-professors-records
> 
> I know that it's been three weeks since that decision, but . . . it's football season, ok?
> 
> Besides, it takes a lot of time to redact years and years of documents.
> 
> Seeya round town, Moscow.
> 
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
> 
> 
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20111025/7bc3add5/attachment.html>