[Vision2020] Fw: Rozen editorial

[Joe Campbell]

Oops! Sent this from a truck stop in Sandpoint, thinking Gary was talking about Rose!

Here is one important difference between Gary's request to Shirley and my requests to Bouma (I assume I'm speaking for some others too). I'm not asking or expecting Bouma to answer my questions on vision 2020. I know that won't happen. I'm just asking that he speak to the issues raised, pointing out that some folks might want to know how he feels about Mormons. If he doesn't have harsh feelings about them, like his Pastor does, that should be an easy point to make. Thus, his silence is at least curious.

Another difference, of course, is that Shirley has answered Gary's question but Bouma has not answered ANY. Not here, not there, not any where.

I believe that's a political slam dunk in your face, Gary! And yes I am loving it.

Thanks, Shirley, for taking the high ground!



On Oct 31, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com> wrote:

> She's not running for office.
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 30, 2010, at 9:24 PM, "Gary Crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com> wrote:
> 
>> I thought I made it clear that her opportunities to make trouble for Idaho's firearms owners would be few and far between and that should any arise, her lonely and ineffective voice would be unlikely to win any over to her cause . My point is why would be want to send to Boise someone whose views differed so jarringly with those of the majority of the districts residents and who would be so totally out of step with Idaho's sporting heritage?
>>  
>> All of this overlooks the larger question which continues to be, why is she "killing democracy" by refusing to respond to the question on this relevant topic?
>>  
>> Despite all her posturing, I guess expecting answers to a voters request for information must be  the exclusive right of those on the left.
>>  
>> g
>> 
>> From: Andreas Schou
>> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 8:48 PM
>> To: Gary Crabtree
>> Cc: ringoshirl ; vision2020 at moscow.com 
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Rozen editorial
>> 
>> Gary,
>> 
>> Presuming the worst, what is the actual capacity for a state senator (esp. in a Republican-dominated state) to deal damage to your second amendment rights? Understand that Heller and McDonald currently stand in the way of all but the most common-sense restrictions. 
>> 
>> -- ACS
>> 
>> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Gary Crabtree <jampot at roadrunner.com> wrote:
>> While we wait patiently for Ms. Ringo to summon up the courage and the rhetoric to respond to my inquiry why don't we
>> take a look at what an F grade entails. From the NRA/PVF web  site:
>> F-"True enemy of gun owners' rights. A consistent anti-gun candidate who always opposes gun owners' rights and/or actively leads anti-gun legislative efforts, or sponsors anti-gun legislation."
>>  
>> Sounds just like what we need in Boise. Granted the opportunities for her to damage the second amendment are few and far between but, none the less
>> this hardly seems like values representative of district 6. Fortunately for hunters and firearms enthusiasts Ms. Ringo will be spending the lions share of her
>> time in Boise (should we be so unfortunate as to see her sent back) working on schemes to increase taxes and searching for ways to express her undying gratitude to the unions that are her biggest supporters:
>> Idaho Education Association
>> 
>> Idaho AFL-CIO
>> 
>> National Association of Social Workers
>> 
>>  
>> I would suggest giving Mr. Young a second look. I honestly believe that his values are more closely aligned with those of the voters in Latah Co.
>>  than those of "The progressive from six."
>>  
>> 
>> g
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> From: Gary Crabtree
>> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 6:12 PM
>> To: ringoshirl ; vision2020 at moscow.com
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Rozen editorial
>> 
>> That strikes me as a Democracy killing non response to a perfectly valid question.
>>  
>> g
>> 
>> From: ringoshirl
>> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 12:03 PM
>> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>> Subject: [Vision2020] Fw: Rozen editorial
>> 
>>  
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: ringoshirl
>> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 9:36 AM
>> Subject: Rozen editorial
>> 
>> Visionaries:
>>  
>> As you might imagine, I think Mr. Rozen missed the point. 
>>  
>> In any event, I think I know him better than before.
>>  
>> Shirley
>> =======================================================
>>  List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>>                http://www.fsr.net                          
>>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
>> =======================================================
>>  List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>>                http://www.fsr.net                          
>>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
>> 
>> =======================================================
>>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>               http://www.fsr.net
>>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
>> 
>> =======================================================
>> List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>>               http://www.fsr.net                       
>>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20101031/89789251/attachment-0001.html