[Vision2020] Curiosity Question

[Joe Campbell]

Spell check, Roger. You have it, use it. Best, Joe



On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:05 AM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:

> Darrell
> The points you brought up are examples of Joe's  critical thinking shills.
> Roger
> -----Original message-----
> From: Darrell Keim keim153 at gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:42:16 -0800
> To: Joe Campbell philosopher.joe at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Curiosity Question
> 
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm happy for you that the fact that at least two radical rightwing
>>> churches, ones who continually disrespect and even threaten people who
>>> have alternative world views, exist in Moscow; that one of them ran a
>>> candidate for political office, hoping to extend their narrow, bigoted
>>> views.
>> 
>> 
>> I'm going to assume that the above incomplete sentence was intended to say
>> something along the lines that the radical rightwing churches don't bother
>> me.  Again, you are reading more into my note than I actually said.  You
>> have no idea what I think of them.  All you know is that I didn't think we
>> needed to bring Christ Church into Tom's church list question.  That comment
>> was followed by Tom himself saying something very similar in a follow-up
>> note.  I am perfectly happy that you are interested in these two churches.
>> Just because something is not a topic I pursue vociferously does not mean
>> others shouldn't.  Unfortunately, this listserv seems like a one note
>> instrument when almost everything is linked to that same topic.
>> 
>> As to any new remarks made by NSA-how are they breaking news?  Are they
>> breaking with previous pronouncements?  You (and others) find their beliefs
>> and stances repugnant.  Nothing new there.  If the dog has always smelled,
>> why keep talking about it if that is all the action you plan to take?
>> 
>> I do find it interesting how you feel free to make accusations about me but
>> are unwilling/able to back them up when pressed (Too summarize for our
>> viewership you have made four unproven/untrue accusations about me:  1.  I
>> am unconcerned about these local churches.  2. I have criticized people that
>> are.  3.  I am only concerned about threatening remarks made about
>> Christians.  4.  I am a Christian-I'll concede this point, I'm a
>> Protestant.).  That's a lot of unwarranted assumptions you make about me.
>> We all know what happens when you ass-u-me.  Doesn't lead credence to your
>> other discussion points.  I hope for better use of argumentation and logic
>> from a philosopher with such an awesome name.
>> 
>> I've told you how I stand up for what I'm concerned about.  I volunteer
>> and/or work for agencies that make a difference.  Do you do anything other
>> than write and talk?  Nott meant as a jab.  I really am curious, and suspect
>> others on v2020 are too.  I know it means more to me when someone combines
>> their talk with action.  As an aside, I am currently reading a bio of Irish
>> hunger striker Bobby Sands.  What a guy!  He REALLY walked the talk.
>> 
>>