[Vision2020] Statesman: Idahoans want it both ways
Ron Force
rforce2003 at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 21 19:21:57 PST 2010
November 21, 2010
Our View: Idahoans speak up. They want it both ways.
- Idaho Statesman
Are Idahoans hoping for the best — or are they hopelessly out of touch with
reality? It’s tough to tell.
Idahoans are pretty clear that they don’t want further cuts to education or
Medicaid. A recent survey, conducted by the Republican polling firm Moore
Information, pegged the opposition at 82 percent and 76 percent, respectively.
But in that same poll of registered voters, Idahoans were nearly as dead set
against sales or income tax increases — 65 percent opposition, in both cases.
Sounds great.
But here’s the reality check.
* Idaho is staring at a potential 2011-12 shortfall of $340 million.
* That shortfall represents 14 percent of the budget.
* During the 2010 legislative session, the public schools’ budget took a 7.5
percent cut. The cut for higher education was 11.3 percent.
* Gov. Butch Otter and the Legislature made those unprecedented cuts after
spending most of the state’s budget reserves. This was a last-ditch move, not
unlike depleting the savings account to keep up with the mortgage.
Now, the state’s piggy banks are almost empty. So, the state needs to cut its
budgets to balance the books — or find an additional, ongoing source of money.
* What kind of a tax increase? Consider this, just for the sake of context.
Idaho’s current 6 percent sales tax is expected to generate $976.5 million this
year. Idaho could tack another 2 cents onto the sales tax, and still fall short
of erasing its shortfall.
* Idahoans didn’t rule out tax increases. The Moore Information survey found
71 percent support for increasing “sin” taxes on alcohol and tobacco. But these
tax increases wouldn’t fill much of a $340 million hole. Especially if the
money is applied to preventive programs; 83 percent of respondents favored
using new tobacco taxes for Medicaid, or programs that help tobacco users or
combat teenage tobacco use. Worthy programs, of course — but dollars that go
into these programs are unavailable for education, which accounts for nearly
two-thirds of the state’s general fund budget.
Idaho’s fiscal crisis is worse than many Idahoans seem to think. That’s the
only conclusion we can derive from the Moore Information survey conducted Oct.
17-18, barely two weeks before Election Day. Idahoans spoke loud and clear.
Don’t cut education and Medicaid. Don’t raise sales or income taxes.
But that’s unrealistic.
It’s quite possible, by the end of the 2011 session, that lawmakers will cobble
together some combination of budget cuts and tax increases. Schools and state
agencies probably can’t absorb a $340 million budget cut. The state’s sluggish
economy cannot sustain a $340 million tax increase.
The way the state — and its elected officials — choose to reconcile these
severe budget realities will directly affect schoolkids, businesses and
taxpayers for 2011 and beyond. Every legislative session is important. This
next one will be crucial. Defining. Pivotal. And no, those aren’t
overstatements.
If Idahoans don’t get informed and involved in the discussion — starting now,
in the seven weeks before the 2011 Legislature convenes — they won’t have much
room to second-guess the outcomes. At this point, lawmakers are left to
interpret the people’s mixed message as best as they can. Or, looking at it
more cynically, lawmakers are free to pick and choose the talking point that
fits their preconceptions.
Yes, Idahoans, it is time to engage. The first step in engagement is
understanding the problem, in all its harsh detail. In that regard, there’s a
lot of work to do.
“Our View” is the editorial position of the Idaho Statesman. It is an unsigned
opinion expressing the consensus of the Statesman’s editorial board. To comment
on an editorial or suggest a topic, e-mail editorial at idahostatesman.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20101121/c735e7e1/attachment.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list