[Vision2020] FW: discharging firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree doesn't

[keely emerinemix]

Yeah, I know.  But I've already pissed everyone off . . . I figured "Kentucky" would be safer!

Keely
www.keely-prevailingwinds.com




From: deco at moscow.com
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:58:47 -0700
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] FW:  discharging firearms- was Pres mans-up,	Crabtree doesn't










Kentucky?  Try every northern county of this 
state!
 
w.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: 
  keely emerinemix 
  
  To: dickow at turbonet.com ; vision2020 at moscow.com 
  Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 1:21 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Vision2020] FW: discharging 
  firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree doesn't
  
Not really responding to the "bear/use" argument, but along the 
  same line . . . I continually wonder why the phrase "well-regulated militia" 
  in the Second Amendment doesn't get more discussion.  It seems to me that 
  a bunch of poorly informed, angry, hate-fueled, paranoid men crawling around a 
  Kentucky forest in greasepaint with little supervision and lots of powerful 
  arms and ammo can't possibly be a "well-regulated" ANYTHING, much less a 
  "militia."  If these types of people would submit to commonsense 
  regulation, order, discipline, accountability and the occasional intrusion of 
  fact, perhaps we could then consider their gun rights in a different 
  light.

Frankly, these "militias" are an insult to the brave men and 
  women in the U.S. armed forces, and the worst possible argument in favor of 
  wide-open gun ownership and use.

Keely
www.keely-prevailingwinds.com




> 
  From: dickow at turbonet.com
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Date: Fri, 
  5 Nov 2010 12:43:52 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] FW: discharging 
  firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree doesn't
> 
> Thanks, Tom! The 
  Webster online does NOT indicate that 'to bear' (at least
> in the case 
  of bearing arms) means also 'to use.' I feel better now.
> 
> Bob 
  Dickow, troublemaker
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
  vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> 
  On Behalf Of Robert Dickow
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:01 
  PM
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: [Vision2020] FW: 
  discharging firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree
> doesn't
> 
  
> Well, I guess if 'to bear' means also 'to use,' then my argument does 
  not
> hold. However, I must say that that definition was not my 
  lifelong
> understanding of the meaning of 'to bear,' which is means 'to 
  carry,' as in
> 'to bear a heavy load of wood.' Using the wood is 
  another thing altogether.
> ("Hand me that match, will ya? I want to 
  finish up bearing my wood now.")
> 
> Bob Dickow, troublemaker 
  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
  vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> 
  On Behalf Of Garrett Clevenger
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:32 
  AM
> To: vision2020_moscow.com
> Subject: [Vision2020] discharging 
  firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree
> doesn't
> 
> Bob 
  writes:
> 
> "But to complicate things, keep in mind that although 
  the Constitution
> protects the right to keep and bear arms, it says 
  nothing about our rights
> to discharge those arms."
> 
> 
  
> >From what my dictionary says, "to bear" means "to hold and use" 
  which in
> the case of a firearm seems to me to mean to 
  discharge.
> 
> If a law prevents someone from using their gun, 
  how is that not
> unconstitutional? (I'm playing the devil's advocate 
  here)
> 
> I suppose that since there are laws that limit free 
  speech, I suppose
> interpretation of our constitutional amendments is 
  very subjective.
> 
> gclev
> 
> 
  =======================================================
> List services 
  made available by First Step Internet, 
> serving the communities of the 
  Palouse since 1994. 
> http://www.fsr.net 
> 
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> 
  =======================================================
> 
> 
  =======================================================
> List services 
  made available by First Step Internet, 
> serving the communities of the 
  Palouse since 1994. 
> http://www.fsr.net 
> 
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> 
  =======================================================
> 
> 
  =======================================================
> List services 
  made available by First Step Internet, 
> serving the communities of the 
  Palouse since 1994. 
> http://www.fsr.net 
> 
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> 
  =======================================================

  
  

  =======================================================
 List 
  services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the 
  communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
  
               
  http://www.fsr.net                       
  
          
  mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
======================================================= 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20101105/b0244869/attachment.html