[Vision2020] Legislative Report from Ringo

[Donovan Arnold]

Rep. Ringo,
 
Thank you for the report. 
 
I think it is a morally disgusting to tax parents for having children with disabilities. Parents with children with disabilities already have enough burdens without the State imposing more taxes or fees on them. I wouldn't think twice about voting against anyone that voted for such a thing, or to write a check to their opponent in the next couple of elections to rid such scum from our legislative process. I don't even understand how such blatant discrimination can be constitutional even in Idaho's medieval attitude toward those with differences. 
 
I am also opposed to cutting State jobs. It will only make a bad situation worse. Cutting jobs will cost the state more in unemployment, welfare, medicaid, food stamps, and crime, and reduce the number of people paying taxes and buying products to keep private sector jobs. It is better to cut the salaries of people by 10% than to lay off 10% of the people. 
 
I am also opposed to anymore income taxes. People making over 30K a year already pay nearly 50% of their income in taxes when you count, federal, state, property, local, communication, transportation, sin tax, sales tax, value added taxes, shipping taxes, import taxes, gas taxes, and other hidden taxes and costs associated with taxation we don't see. 
 
If you are looking for added revenue I would suggest getting it from those that evade paying their taxes and those businesses that get tax breaks and don't create jobs, or from businesses that ship jobs out of state and/or out of country. 
 
Thanks for listening.
 
 
Donovan Arnold
 

--- On Tue, 2/16/10, Shirley Ringo <ringoshirl at moscow.com> wrote:


From: Shirley Ringo <ringoshirl at moscow.com>
Subject: [Vision2020] Legislative Report from Ringo
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 5:32 PM





Visionaries:
 

Because of the extremely low revenue projection adopted by the Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee, budgets for fiscal year 2011 will require more dire measures such as laying off employees, requiring user fees for parents of children with disabilities, and more furloughing.  I will have specific information soon about the budgets for public schools and higher education.
I have been thinking about the general fairness of requiring employees to take furlough days.   While it is a money-saving action that keeps people from being laid off, there are other ways to share the burden.
State employees who have been required to take five furlough days have lost approximately 2% of pay.  At the same time, they have worked to provide the same public services for which they are responsible.   It seems close to imposing a tax upon this class of employees.
If we were to broaden the population to share the burden of revenue shortages by putting a state-wide revenue enhancement plan in place, the impact on individuals would be less.  For example, consider the proposal to impose a 5% surcharge on personal income tax for individuals with taxable incomes exceeding $50,000 per year.  An example of the impact:  a family of four earning about $75,000 per year would pay an addition $164 in state income taxes.  This is a 0.22% increase for that family.  (The revenue gained would not solve all problems, but there are other ideas that could be used also.)
I would like to hear from you on this subject.   The path we are taking will require employees to take many more furlough days.  
Today in the Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee, we heard that from February 1, 2009, to September 30, 2009, “Rule 19 screening teams” have screened 119 juvenile offenders across the state.  Of those, 52% were diverted for treatment in community programs.  To date, 86% of those who were diverted have remained out of Idaho Juvenile Corrections custody.
As many of you have heard, HCR042 was introduced in the House State Affairs Committee.  The sponsor, Dennis Lake, proposes to cancel the 1% COLA for PERSI retirees.  I have received many messages asking me to oppose this legislation.   If you oppose HCR042, you should also write to members of the House State Affairs Committee at this time and ask them to hold the legislation in committee.
SB 1353, the “Conscience Bill,” proposes that “No health Care Professional shall be required to provide any health care service that violates his or her conscience.”  This bill is under consideration in the Senate State Affairs Committee.
Please contact me with your issues and concerns.
Rep. Shirley Ringo
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet, 
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100216/82336bc1/attachment-0001.html