[Vision2020] He's Baaaaaaack . . .

[g. crabtree]

Thank you. It's worked out rather well for me so far.

g
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Campbell" <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>
To: "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>
Cc: "Joseph Campbell" <josephc at wsu.edu>; <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] He's Baaaaaaack . . .


> Good luck with that!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 18, 2009, at 7:14 PM, "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>  wrote:
>
>> Sage advise is a wonderful gift to be greatly prized. Yours has been 
>> worth every cent I've paid for it over the years. Had my goal been  to 
>> remake myself in your own image I'd have been quicker to find a  way to 
>> put it to a practical application. I'm going in a somewhat  different 
>> direction however.
>>
>> My thanks for all that you are anyway,
>> g
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Campbell" 
>> <philosopher.joe at gmail.com
>> >
>> To: "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>
>> Cc: "Joseph Campbell" <josephc at wsu.edu>; <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 6:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] He's Baaaaaaack . . .
>>
>>
>>> What new location?
>>>
>>> I signed up for a gmail account, sent a message from it, it didn't 
>>> work, so I sent another one. (Using an iPhone for this purpose is  a 
>>> pain!) Then hours later the first message appeared!
>>>
>>> Look I didn't intend to insult you, I'm just giving you advice.  You 
>>> don't have to take it. I think you're being used. But that's  just my 
>>> opinion!
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 3:45 PM, "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm confused. Why come to this forum to ask me questions you don't 
>>>> really want answers to and express concern for matters that are 
>>>> decidedly not up for your consideration and then come back from a   new 
>>>> location and paraphrase yourself  two hours latter? Did you  feel  it 
>>>> was so important and unique it required two posts to  capture its 
>>>> poignancy?
>>>>
>>>> For the record, with regard to the matter at hand, I feel zero  shame 
>>>> and take (from any quarter that matters) absolutely no  heat, and my 
>>>> "name and family security" are in no danger what so  ever.
>>>>
>>>> What I'd like to know is how come, amongst a certain element on  this 
>>>> list, what an individual does or says is synonymous with  their 
>>>> church's ministers position? Should I hold the minister of  the 
>>>> Unitarian church responsible for the contrary opinions of  Peggy 
>>>> Jenkins or Prof. Gier? Should I hold atheists in general  responsible 
>>>> for the remarks with which I disagree as made by  Chasuk, Deco, 
>>>> Moffatt, et. al? Blame neo-pagans in general for  the wayward  comments 
>>>> of Deb Smith?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> g
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Campbell" <josephc at wsu.edu
>>>> >
>>>> To: <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 7:33 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] He's Baaaaaaack . . .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Crabtree spends his time supporting Christ Church sources: No
>>>>> Weatherman, the Bigot guy, etc. He is a shill and nothing more.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary, I can't understand why you are their spokesperson, why you  let
>>>>> them shame you, why you are willing to take the heat when they are
>>>>> not? None of them are willing to stand by these views -- the  bigoted
>>>>> views of No Weatherman, for instance. Why are you willing? Why do  you
>>>>> put ypur name beside this crap while they do not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 17, 2009, at 6:36 PM, "Robert Dickow" <dickow at uidaho.edu> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The NoSuperWalmart site had nothing whatsoever to do with the UofI
>>>>>> at any
>>>>>> time. Why did this connection ever get made? It was the home site
>>>>>> for a
>>>>>> grass-roots community-concerns political organizing effort. Once  the
>>>>>> battle
>>>>>> was won against the location chosen for the proposed SuperWalmart
>>>>>> development, the site became more of a positive 'Yes to Moscow'
>>>>>> theme. The
>>>>>> URL is http://www.nosuperwalmart.com.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bob Dickow, troublemaker
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com 
>>>>>> [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
>>>>>> ]
>>>>>> On Behalf Of Joseph Campbell
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 6:03 PM
>>>>>> To: Paul Rumelhart; g. crabtree
>>>>>> Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] He's Baaaaaaack . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Get a clue. Check the source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/17/09 5:59 PM, "Paul Rumelhart" <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've never seen the nosuperwalmart site.  What are the facts?   Was
>>>>>>> it an
>>>>>>> official UI webpage?  Was it the personal page of a UI employee?
>>>>>>> In the
>>>>>>> first case, they have a case.  In the second, the UI is acting  more
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> an ISP hosting personal content.  I don't know the law there,  but I
>>>>>>> doubt it's as cut-and-dried.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What was the URL to the page?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul <snip>
>>>>>> ==========
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =======================================================
>>>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>>>>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>>>>>            http://www.fsr.net
>>>>>>       mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>>>> =======================================================
>>>>>
>>>>> =======================================================
>>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>>>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>>>>             http://www.fsr.net
>>>>>        mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>>> =======================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>