[Vision2020] Why I (don't) Support Gay Marriage

[Joe Campbell]

You keep bringing up the fact that something is or is not legal as  
justification that it should or should not be legal. By that light,  
you now have no complaint to offer in the smoking case. It IS illegal  
to smoke in bars, so it should be! We're not deriving people of  
rights; we're just following the law.

You can marry the one adult you want to marry but Mo cannot. That is a  
clear double-standard. How is that not telling people who to marry?

As I said, it is a weird kind of political view that thinks smoking in  
public can't be regulated by the government but marriage should be.  
And whatever it is it is not pro-freedom.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:11 AM, "the lockshop" <lockshop at pull.twcbc.com>  
wrote:

> That you don't understand comes as no big suprise. In the first  
> instance an existing right, the right to indulge in a legal activity  
> on private property, is stripped away at the insistance of a small  
> group of zealots (I recall no mention of communist influence on my  
> part) In the second, the government is NOT taking anything away.  
> (from a slightly different small group of zealots) They are also NOT  
> telling anyone who to marry. To claim they are is, as usual, silly,  
> blatantly false, and makes no sense.
>
> g
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Joe Campbell
> To: g. crabtree
> Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 7:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Why I Support    Gay Marriage
>
> I don't understand someone who gets worked up because the local  
> government won't allow smoking in bars, who thinks that that is some  
> kind of communist influence, but who thinks the government CAN tell  
> folks who to marry, and anyone who says otherwise is acting like a  
> child. It makes no sense.
>
> Your pal, Joe
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 6:51 AM, "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> "Are you suggesting that if one doesn't have and answer to this  
>> question, then the state need not allow the marriage?"
>>
>> No. I was suggesting that it would make for a more useful and  
>> interesting discussion than falling back on the same tactic that  
>> most 5 year olds use when told no. "But I want it!" and "That's no  
>> fair" followed by a stomp of the foot quickly become tedious and  
>> really do very little to further the conversation.
>>
>> g
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Joe Campbell
>> To: g. crabtree
>> Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 6:22 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Why I Support Gay Marriage
>>
>> Gary wrote: "Why don't you explain to me all the myriad ways in  
>> which you being able to marry your partner is a benefit to me and/ 
>> or society?" Can you answer this question, Gary? Are you suggesting  
>> that if one doesn't have and answer to this question, then the  
>> state need not allow the marriage? Should this be the standard for  
>> what the state allows and what it doesn't e.g. whether it is a  
>> benefit to society? Funny this didn't come up in the smoking issue!
>>
>> Your pal, Joe
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 7:14 PM, "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Why don't you explain to me all the myriad ways in which you being  
>>> able to marry your partner is a benefit to me and/or society?"
>>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.55/2301 - Release Date:  
> 08/13/09 18:16:00
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090814/81e2f799/attachment.html