[Vision2020] State Faculty Union Responds to Financial Crisis
lfalen
lfalen at turbonet.com
Wed Apr 29 12:14:13 PDT 2009
Saundra
Thanks for the information on how furloughs work. Staff are payed by the hour so this would work for them. Since faculty are salaried and payed by the month this probably would not work. I doubt that the new president will take a pay cut. He would not come here until this salary was increased.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: "Saundra Lund" sslund_2007 at verizon.net
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:52:58 -0700
To: "'lfalen'" lfalen at turbonet.com, "'Tom Hansen'" thansen at moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] State Faculty Union Responds to Financial Crisis
> Roger, one of my friends who has been through the whole furlough deal with the UI before told me that you *don't* do without a paycheck -- she said that people had a day a week (or maybe every two weeks or once a month -- I don't remember) where they didn't work. So, yes, paychecks were reduced because people were working fewer hours, *but* their base pay was preserved, they were getting something (time off) in return for the reduced paycheck, and because they the furlough days were set, people had the opportunity to find other small things to try to supplement the income decrease that came from the mandatory furlough days.
>
> Now, times are tough all around now, so perhaps opportunities to supplement income due to mandatory furloughs will be scarce, but there seems to be something less objectionable for most people about having unpaid mandatory time off. That's probably not a universal, but it's the case with my friends who are staff.
>
> I don't know what happens with faculty when there are mandatory furloughs -- clearly, it doesn't seem to be fair for classes to be cancelled since students have paid for those classes -- does anyone know how that was handled with the previous furlough?
>
> And, from Mike's post yesterday, we now know that the whole "I'll take a pay cut so that no one loses their job" idea at the UI is misleading since his family friend has already lost their job at the UI :-( So, maybe pay cuts will keep *some* people from losing their jobs, but it certainly doesn't look like it's going to protect *everyone's* jobs, and I think it's important in these discussions to realize that.
>
> BTW, I'm still hoping for an answer as to whether the new president will take a pay cut if that's what winds up happening to everyone else? Does anyone know???
>
>
> Saundra Lund
> Moscow, ID
>
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.
> ~ Edmund Burke
>
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2009 through life plus 70 years, Saundra Lund. Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the author.*****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lfalen [mailto:lfalen at turbonet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:35 AM
> To: Tom Hansen
> Cc: Saundra Lund; 'Joe Campbell'; 'Dickow'; vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] State Faculty Union Responds to Financial Crisis
>
> The things to consider on furloughs are: Can you make it with out a pay check if you can't find a fill in job and are you eligible for unemployment if you take a furlough? If you can not make your payments then it would no be a viable option. If you can make it financially then a furlough might be preferable to a pay cut.
> Roger
> -----Original message-----
> From: "Tom Hansen" thansen at moscow.com
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:53:04 -0700
> To: "lfalen" lfalen at turbonet.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] State Faculty Union Responds to Financial Crisis
>
> > I would be more than willing to take a pay cut (including my military retirement pension) if it
> > meant saving the job and keeping food on the dinner table of another.
> >
> > But, then, I guess that I just ain's as self-serving as some.
> >
> > Tom Hansen
> > Moscow, Idaho
> >
> > > Saundra
> > > I would be on the fence about furloughs, but agree with your last two paragraphs.
> > > Roger
> > > -----Original message-----
> > > From: "Saundra Lund" sslund_2007 at verizon.net
> > > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:54:56 -0700
> > > To: "'Joe Campbell'" philosopher.joe at gmail.com, "'Dickow'" dickow at turbonet.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] State Faculty Union Responds to Financial Crisis
> > >
> > >> I thought it was an excellent post as well . . . I had the privilege of
> > >> meeting Mr. Dickow last night for the first time & told him so in person.
> > >>
> > >> I also have a question: will the new UI president also be taking a pay cut?
> > >> If not, then I see why anyone should have to take one.
> > >>
> > >> I have another question as well: a couple of friends I have who are staff
> > >> members at UI are far more in favor of furloughs than pay cuts to keep
> > >> anyone from being fired. One friend explained it as a pay cut is going to
> > >> be a major hardship on many whether it comes from an actual pay cut or
> > >> furlough, but at least with mandatory furloughs, you get something in
> > >> return: some free time and the opportunity to look for a little part-time
> > >> gig to make up for the reduced pay from working fewer hours. She said
> > >> that's what she did the last time to keep her head above water. I'm
> > >> wondering what others think about furloughs instead of pay cuts?
> > >>
> > >> And, I have a comment as well. I think it truly admirable that so many are
> > >> willing to take pay cuts to save the jobs of others in the university
> > >> community! However, I'd be happier if I saw that same caring spirit from
> > >> those at the top by them being willing to sacrifice for those at the bottom
> > >> who can ill-afford *any* pay cut. There's a *huge* difference, IMHO,
> > >> between taking a pay cut that may cause you to have to skip one of several
> > >> vacations this year or not be able to buy a new car and not being able to go
> > >> to the doctor what with that $2300 deductible on the only coverage plan you
> > >> could afford in the first place or not being able to buy your kids new shoes
> > >> or being able to afford to pay your child support.
> > >>
> > >> The people I know at the lower end of the pay scales have a different
> > >> attitude about these pay cuts: they'd love to be in a position to be able
> > >> to comfortably advocate for pay cuts to save jobs. That doesn't mean that
> > >> they don't prefer taking pay cuts to losing their own jobs, but it's a lot
> > >> harder for them to swallow taking cuts that will threaten their families to
> > >> save the jobs of others. Some are very scared about how they'll manage to
> > >> live with a pay cut. And, I can't say as I blame them.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> JMHO,
> > >> Saundra Lund
> > >> Moscow, ID
> > >>
> > >> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
> > >> nothing.
> > >> ~ Edmund Burke
> > >>
> > >> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2009 through life plus
> > >> 70 years, Saundra Lund. Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside
> > >> the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
> > >> author.*****
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> > >> On Behalf Of Joe Campbell
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 5:50 AM
> > >> To: Dickow
> > >> Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
> > >> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] State Faculty Union Responds to Financial Crisis
> > >>
> > >> This is a great post. I wonder why no one has responded.
> > >>
> > >> Joe Campbell
> > >>
> > >> On Apr 27, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Dickow <dickow at turbonet.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > The problem in my book concerning a 3% cut to state employees is
> > >> > that it is, in effect, a direct tax on a special segment of the
> > >> > state's population. The state would be making up its shortfalls at
> > >> > the expense of state employees. I think that the state shouldn't be
> > >> > thought of as an entity like a company, which might indeed have to
> > >> > trim their employees in some form or other. But in in the case of
> > >> > the state, the employees would be making a sacrifice that directly
> > >> > benefits other people in the state, not the owners of a somel
> > >> > corporation. A more equitable solution to the state's budgetary woes
> > >> > would be to impose a tax of some kind on everyone in the state.
> > >> > Then, everyone might have to kick back 1/2 percent or something, and
> > >> > all would be well. But alas, raising taxes is political NO NO!
> > >> > And... by the way, whatever happened to the state's Emergency Fund.
> > >> > did they spend that already?
> > >> >
> > >> > Bob Dickow, troublemaker
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original message-----
> > >> > From: Joe Campbell philosopher.joe at gmail.com
> > >> > Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:37:18 -0700
> > >> > To: lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com
> > >> > Subject: [Spam] Re: [Vision2020] State Faculty Union Responds to
> > >> > Financial Crisis
> > >> >
> > >> >> I'm sorry to hear about your wife's situation, Roger. Staff is
> > >> >> getting
> > >> >> the worst of it at WSU, too.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> But I still think Nick has a point. Here is one way to put it. Would
> > >> >> you or anyone else on this list be willing to "cut" your pay by
> > >> >> giving
> > >> >> 3% more to the state of ID to help prevent folks at UI from being
> > >> >> fired? If you and others say "yes," then I'm on board, as well!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Joe Campbell
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Apr 27, 2009, at 10:03 AM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Joe
> > >> >>> I do no want you or any one else to lose their job. I think that pay
> > >> >>> cuts are preferable to layoffs.It is inevitably that some programs
> > >> >>> will be cut. there are no students or very few for a class it will
> > >> >>> be cut. My wife is staff in the PSES department at UI. She runs the
> > >> >>> Soils Pedology Lab. She will receive an award for 40 years of
> > >> >>> service today. She puts in 10 to 12 hours a day and does not get
> > >> >>> comp. time. She had cancer in 2003. She had surgery, chemo,
> > >> >>> radiation and the whole ball of wax. She is still suffering from
> > >> >>> the after affects. She takes a lot of Ibuprofen and diuretics to
> > >> >>> keep on going. She is not yet eligible for full Social Security.
> > >> >>> <snip>....
> > >> >
> > >> > =======================================================
> > >> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > >> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > >> > http://www.fsr.net
> > >> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > >> > =======================================================
> > >>
> > >> =======================================================
> > >> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > >> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > >> http://www.fsr.net
> > >> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > >> =======================================================
> > >>
> > >> =======================================================
> > >> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > >> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > >> http://www.fsr.net
> > >> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > >> =======================================================
> > >>
> > >
> > > =======================================================
> > > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > > http://www.fsr.net
> > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > =======================================================
> >
> >
> > "The Pessimist complains about the wind, the Optimist expects it to change and the Realist adjusts
> > his sails."
> >
> > - Unknown
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list