[Vision2020] "Harsh" Interrogations -As ye sow, so shall you

[Andreas Schou]

Gary --

So, what you're saying is that you concede that abuses took place; you
concede that interrogation techniques like uninsulated 30 and 100 degree
temperatures; you concede that the same guy responsible for Abu Ghraib was
responsible for GTMO; you concede that any technique that did not produce
pain "equivalent to death or organ failure" was approved for use on our GTMO
detainees. And you claim that you don't support any of these things: that
these things are torture.

And then, conceding that we did these things, you nonetheless bang the table
and insist that our approach to interrogation didn't constitute torture. The
most charitable interpretation of this is that you are merely incapable of
drawing conclusion. However, having corresponded with you over the years,
I've found that you have a genius for drawing incorrect and immoral
conclusions.

What are the facts as you believe them to be? Did we waterboard? Did we
leave detainees shackled to the ceiling, stewing in their own shit? How
about week-long periods of sleep deprivation over years of detention? Did we
do that? Do you think this is consistent with our values?  Do you think we
should be ordering US servicemen to do this sort of thing? Is that
consistent with a duty to protect the honor of our servicemen and
intelligenc officers?
-- ACS

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:32 PM, a <smith at turbonet.com> wrote:

>  You're absolutely right. As a work of pulp fiction it's right up there
> with the Left Behind series and any of the vapid crap produced by Dan Brown.
>
> By the numbers:
>
> 1. I have at no time tried to justify the abuses in the FBI report to such
> as being chained with no access to food, water, or toilet facilities.
>
> 2. Exposing anyone to low temperatures to the point of hypothermia
> (Although one wonders how many US soldiers were treated for the same thing
> that night, no "torture" involved)
>
> 3. Sexual abuse of any description.
>
> Pretending that these are my expressed views and then vigorously taking me
> to task for them is dishonest in the extreme and is exactly the sort of
> thing I have come to expect from Mr. Schou. Playing fast and loose with the
> truth has allways been a hallmark of his debate style and for him to hold
> himself up as a paragon of moral righteousness is laughable. I believe that
> he would do well to climb down off his rustled moral high horse and respond
> to what I actually write not what he concocts in his fevered imagination.
>
> g
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>  *From:* keely emerinemix <kjajmix1 at msn.com>
> *To:* ophite at gmail.com ; jampot at roadrunner.com
> *Cc:* vision2020 at moscow.com
>  *Sent:* Friday, April 24, 2009 11:57 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] "Harsh" Interrogations -As ye sow, so shall
> you
>
> This is probably the finest post I've ever read on Vision 2020.
>
> Thanks, Andreas.
>
> Keely
> http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:31:27 -0700
> From: ophite at gmail.com
> To: jampot at roadrunner.com
> CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] "Harsh" Interrogations -As ye sow, so shall you
>
> Gary --
>
> From the FBI report on abuse at Guantanamo Bay under Geoffrey Miller, the
> general later brought in to "Gitmoize" Abu Ghraib:
>
> "on several occasions, witness ("W") saw detainees ("ds") in interrogation
> rooms chained hand and foot in fetal position to floor w/no chair/
> food/water; most urinated or defecated on selves, and were left there 18, 24
> hrs or more. Once, the air conditioning was so low that the barefoot d was
> shaking with cold. Another time, it was off so the unventilated room was
> over 100 degrees, d was almost unconscious on floor with a pile of hair next
> to him (he had apparently been pulling it out throughout the night). Another
> time, it was sweltering hot and loud rap music played - d's hand and foot
> was chained and he was in a fetal position on the floor. Upon inquiry, W was
> told that interrogators [military contractors] ordered this treatment. Took
> place in Delta Camp"
>
> The report goes on to substantiate that more than one detainee (d) was
> brought into the infirmary with hypothermia after an interrogation session.
> Detainees pissing and shitting all over themselves. Being sexually assaulted
> by female guards. Forced to stay awake for longer than the human body can
> stand. Being partially drowned. Being stuck in a coffin with what you're
> told are scorpions.
>
> These are not conditions you will find any Hilton other than the Hanoi.
> They are not on the continuum of acceptable behaviors any more than a knife
> is on the continuum of 'comfortable objects' because, like a knife, it's
> also an object. These are techniques we reverse-engineered from North Korean
> torture techniques in order to create SERE, and then reverse-reverse
> engineered in order to create GTMO and the "black sites." This is despite
> the fact that we -- as in, our country -- prosecuted Japanese soldiers for
> waterboarding, and even Israel, no friend of terrorists, has abandoned it
> because it produces bad intelligence. Indeed, if I were just a little more
> cynical than I am, I'd say that that's quite the point: we waterboarded KSM
> for information on the nonexistent Iraq-al-Qaida connection, and Abu
> Zubaydah for information on confabulated terrorist plots he had no reason to
> know about.
>
> You're wrong about the facts. You're wrong about the law. I could go on
> about that, but I'd just be arguing with the tinny little noises escaping
> from the echo chamber you pretend will replace journalism. I'm waiting with
> bated breath to find out why you think the FBI is infiltrated by ACORN or
> how George Soros is dictating the legal conclusions of Republican appointees
> at Foggy Bottom. That's just your intentional ignorance, plus arrogance,
> tribalism, and smug self-satisfaction at your clever turns of phrase. I can
> tolerate that.
>
> What gets to me -- why I'm provoked to respond -- is that you're willing,
> even eager, to sell out our country's honor in order to soothe your rank
> cowardice. Or maybe it makes you feel like a real man to hear that some punk
> Afghan teenager with an AK-47 was awake for a week, stewing in his own shit,
> shackled to the floor. Whatever the impulse is -- tribalism? sadism? fear?
> -- it's not anything I recognize as American. What third-world tinpot
> dictatorship did you grow up in that you think this is acceptable?
>
> We consent to abide by certain principles. It's that common consent that
> keeps our country from being a collection of miscellaneous foreigners on
> someone else's land. I have disagreements with conservatives about the metes
> and bounds of those principles, sure. But here you are, disputing whether
> America should have principles at all.
>
> Americans, by which I mean FDR and Eisenhower, Reagan and JFK, held off the
> Soviets and Nazi Germany, nations that both posed a dire existential threat
> to our country, while banning torture, expanding the protections of the
> Geneva Convention, and abandoning the pretense that it's okay to attack
> civilian populations. These are tempting tactics. Some of them work. Torture
> produces words rather than silence. The Geneva Convention bans effective
> tactics for making war. Killing civilians forces submission. We stepped away
> from these things. We won. Twice. Over the two most belligerent,
> technologically advanced, and staggeringly immoral nations ever to exist,
> one armed with enough weapons to destroy the world several times over.
>
> But then 9/11 made you wet yourself. A crime of unimaginable scale happened
> to people in New York City; people whom you don't even accord the privilege
> of being called Americans. The crime was carried out by guys carrying
> weapons you can buy at Home Depot. Somehow, that uprooted your sense that
> America stands for anything. But how deep were those roots, Gary, that fewer
> deaths than those caused by the flu could pull them up?
>
> Our soldiers make a commitment. They tell us they'll uphold the
> Constitution. But there's a reciprocal side to that commtiment: we tell them
> that they're the good guys; that they're not just protecting American lives,
> but American values. That they're fighting for liberty, mom, and apple pie.
> Because 9/11 made you wet yourself, you're asking those soldiers to sit and
> play Minesweeper while some dumb Afghan redneck shits his pants in Arctic
> cold, chained to the ceiling of a lightless cell. If you tell his President
> to tell our soldiers to do that, you've reneged on our commitment to make
> our soldiers the good guys. Our moral purpose doesn't come from who we are;
> it comes from what we do.
>
> I don't know whether there's going to be a reckoning for the people that
> authorized this. But you're the reason there should be: to put the rudder
> straight and make people like you -- who actively argues for torture -- too
> ashamed to speak up in public. Anything you just said should be enough to
> make any decent person drop their beer, walk out of the room, and go find
> another locksmith. I'm looking forward to the day when it is.
>
> ------------------------------
> Rediscover Hotmail®: Get e-mail storage that grows with you. Check it out.<http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Storage2_042009>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.12.4/2078 - Release Date: 04/24/09
> 07:54:00
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090424/fa2adac3/attachment-0001.html