[Vision2020] BACK to the Original Question

[Sunil Ramalingam]

Typical, and predictable as the sun rising in the East. When Donovan is wrong he can't admit it, and if I call him on it he will launch into this slimy attack. Kind of like a jellyfish.

He's an interesting case study.  The prolapse has clearly extruded his entire brain, yet he retains sufficient coordination to operate a keyboard.

Sunil

Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:28:46 -0700
From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] BACK to the Original Question
To: vision2020 at moscow.com; sunilramalingam at hotmail.com; thansen at moscow.com; bear at moscow.com

Sorry, I disagree. 
 
I do agree with what the Ten Commandments say. But I think lots of people disagree with what the Ten Commandments intend and imply. 
 
What I think is a crock is their release. The reality is, child molesters are free, in part, because of the actions of Sunil. You can call it whatever you want, blame it on anyone else, but that is the reality. 
 
And I would not be calling the release of child molesters, "due process." That term is such an injustice to the victims of these people, or shall I call these child molesters, at the risk of offending some liberals on here, monsters. 
 
Best Regards,
 
Donovan

--- On Fri, 4/17/09, bear at moscow.com <bear at moscow.com> wrote:


From: bear at moscow.com <bear at moscow.com>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] BACK to the Original Question
To: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>, "vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>, "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>, "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 8:11 AM


Donovan, What a CROCK! 

First you don't believe what the Ten Commandments say, and now you don't like the way the 
law works! IF I read the court documents correctly, there was a JUDGE that released him,
not 
Sunil! I am sorry that the State of Idaho, as represented by a prosecutor didn't prove
his/her 
case that the individual was a threat to society. You're pointing the finger in the WRONG 
direction on how the legal system worked in this case!




____________________________________________________________________________________________
> Hansen,
>  
> Certainly not a lawyer with a forked tongue that misleads people to draw
> the wrong conclusions and to free child molesters.   
> The child molester can at least claim mental illness for this endangerment
> of children. But what can Sunil claim? 
> I remember, if my memory
 serves me correctly, at how angry Hansen was that
> our local child molester of an eight year old girl, was allowed to drive,
w> ithout supervision, to Lewiston. Guess who was, in part, responsible for
> his release into the Moscow Public?  
> Best Regards,
>  
> Donovan 
> 
> --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090417/b7ff25c5/attachment.html