[Vision2020] Ex-Generals, Admirals: Repeal Policy on Gays
Tom Hansen
thansen at moscow.com
Tue Nov 18 15:54:43 PST 2008
Dan Carscallen stated:
"Does it matter? Gay or straight, they made the supreme sacrifice. Those
names belong to Americans. And we honor them."
You fail to understand the spirit of my question, Dan.
My question is not meant to reflect on the nationality or patriotism of
the 58,195 names as a whole. They (each and every one of those 58,195
Americans) gave their final full measure. The purpose of my question is to
nullify the the ill-conceived "Don't ask. Don't tell." policy of our
military.
To illustrate my point:
>From "A Soldier's Story" at
----------------------------------------------
A Soldier's Story
Making love while making war
by Scooper
(Dedicated to the memory of the late J. R.)
This is what happened to Russ in Vietnam. On R&R in Saigon, he and a
beautiful Vietnamese woman fell desperately, and secretly, in love. After
the madness was over, they would come to America and make a life for
themselves. But for now, they would meet furtively, rarely, briefly.
Nobody who knew either of them could know about both, because her brother
was Vietcong. Technically, they were each sleeping with the enemy.
And then, at their meeting place, she didn't show.
"That one?" said one of his buddies casually, "They say she was killed by
a mine two weeks ago."
The feeling of a kick in the stomach, the taste of acid on the tongue. And
he had to hide it, to stay a soldier.
"Here today, gone tomorrow," he shrugged, feeling suddenly like a traitor -
- not to his country, but to her memory and to himself. But if he shared
his grief with his buddies, they would say it was to his country, and he
would be dishonorably discharged, at best. So he fought on, silenced about
what was becoming an incurable wound.
Funny. Here he was depending for his life at times on people he couldn't
trust. And ready to give his all for those who would turn on him if they
only knew.
When he got stateside, he didn't try to replace the love he'd lost. The
singles bar scene was all he wanted, and he went for it with abandon.
Alcohol and casual sex were his anesthetics for a while. Eventually he
gave them up, left the service, and settled down to a wife and a tolerable
job. And though he looked good on the outside, he had two constant
companions that were slowly killing him. One was depression, and the other
was the virus he'd picked up during one of those dates after the war.
The story of Russ (not his real name) is true, mostly. Except that his
lover was not the enemy. His lover was an American pilot who got his name
put on the big, black wall in Washington for giving "that last full
measure of devotion" while flying a combat mission in Vietnam.
So, when I think of the people who oppose liberalizing the US military's
position on gay and lesbian soldiers, I think of Russ and how he suffered
under that policy. I think about the statistics on homosexuality, and how
they imply that, along with that of Russ' lover, the names of as many as a
thousand homosexuals may be written on the Vietnam War Memorial.
Those homosexual soldiers fought, slept, ate, showered, and died as heroes
alongside heterosexual soldiers. They knew how to handle themselves in all
those situations. Their heterosexual buddies did not, forcing them to keep
their secret, most of them to the grave.
Now we Americans are concerned about the effect of gay and lesbian
soldiers on military morale and discipline. But a thousand names carved in
stone say that's not a gay soldier's problem. It's a straight soldier's
problem. People are concerned because that is the nature of homophobia
homophobia occurs when straights who have problems with gays try to make
gays solve those problems for them even if it's just by keeping their
homosexuality a secret. A thousand names say the concern is based on
mythology believed by straights who don't think they know any gay people.
Except for the concern about how the straight soldiers will behave. On the
other hand, gay bashing is another form of sexual harassment, an area that
the military needs to deal with anyway, as shown by the Tailhook scandal.
So, I think we should move forward on the legalization of gay and lesbian
soldiers. Doing so will take courage and self-discipline, and a sense of
security in our own sexuality. It will take, as a soldier might put
it, "balls."
----------------------------------------------
So, you see, Dan. Labeling them "Americans" is fine. The label suggests
infinite equality. That equality must be enforced not only while in
uniform, but forever after discharge; from the wedding chapels of San
Diego, California to the hospitals of Bangor, Maine; from the court rooms
of Anchorage, Alaska to the classrooms of Miami, Florida.
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
http://www.fsr.com/
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list