[Vision2020] Gays Right to Marriage vs. Black's Right to Vote
Scott Dredge
scooterd408 at hotmail.com
Sun Nov 9 20:51:00 PST 2008
Yes, It's quite ironic since Interracial marriages were banned in California until 1948. According to Dale (who obviously struggled mightily with his attraction to men since he insists that sexuality a choice and not something determined by birth), the voting went the way it did because race is not a choice where as homosexuality / heterosexuality is a choice.
-Scott
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:41:35 -0800
From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] Gays Right to Marriage vs. Black's Right to Vote
Isn't sad irony that Blacks voted 70% to block Gay marriage, the margin of victory on the segragationist and deeply discriminatory intitiative in California was the Black vote.
What Gays should do is get an initiative on the ballot to block Black's constitutional right to vote on the ballot in California, then they can get their keep constitutional right to get married, then vote later to restore the Black vote.
(And yes, I am joking)
Best Regards,
Donovan
_________________________________________________________________
Get 5 GB of storage with Windows Live Hotmail.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_5gb_112008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20081109/357314e7/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list