[Vision2020] LDS Stand on Prop. 8 Oozes Irony
Tom Hansen
thansen at moscow.com
Sun Nov 2 10:23:29 PST 2008
LDS Church criticized for supporting California's anti-gay marriage
proposition, maintaining marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a
woman and a woman and a woman and a woman and a woman and a . . .
-----------------------------------------------------
>From the Salt Lake Tribune at
http://tinyurl.com/6ylgop
-------------------------------
Walsh: LDS stand on Prop. 8 oozes irony
By Rebecca Walsh
Tribune Columnist
Mormons understand a little bit about getting picked on for being
different.
Tales of Haun's Mill, Reed Smoot and Mitt Romney fill Sunday School
and Family Home Evening lessons. Years of violence and lampooning and soft
bigotry drive The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' historical
narrative. Persecution is in the psyche of the people.
But now the victims seem to have turned into the aggressors - and
over, of all things, an alternative definition of marriage.
"This is a church that has been persecuted for its flavor of
Christianity, for its past marriage practices, for its past religious
practices. And here they are turning around and persecuting another group
of people," says Jay Redd, a gay lapsed-Mormon movie director whose San
Francisco marriage ceremony was featured last week in Salon. "I feel like
it's very shortsighted, and it's not a very Christian way of treating
people."
In a four-month offensive, the LDS Church has deployed its faithful as
partisans for California's Proposition 8, a ballot initiative that would
ban gay marriage - the largest mobilization since the faith fought the
Equal Rights Amendment three decades ago. In June, members were asked
to "do all you can." And they have.
As a result, the Salt Lake City-based church gets the credit and the
blame for leading the cause. According to Californians Against Hate,
Mormons have donated more than $19 million to the cause - nearly four out
of five dollars raised.
At the same time, wards are splitting as members' beliefs about gay
rights become a litmus test of righteousness. Families are also divided
between the über-faithful and the conflicted.
Church leaders insist there is a higher cause: "Freedom of religion is
at risk," says L. Whitney Clayton, a member of the LDS Presidency of the
Seventy.
The irony is thick here. But it seems lost on church leaders and many
members.
More than 150 years ago, Mormon settlers were driven from their homes
and their prophet was killed, in part, because of their polygamous
definition of marriage. After years of isolation and marginalization in
the desert, the church abandoned the practice to achieve statehood,
political legitimacy and validation in American society.
Now, Mormons are using the same words that were used against their
ancestors. It's not completely inconsistent with a history and doctrine
centered on procreation.
"I don't think the church ever compromised on its sense that marriage
is the institution through which families are formed and people are
saved," says Sarah Barringer Gordon, a scholar of the law of church and
state who teaches at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law.
Comparing polygamy to gay marriage, she says, "in many church members'
eyes is comparing apples and oranges. You can't compare gay marriage to
polygamy."
Still, in this electrified climate, the church can't escape legitimate
reminders of its muddled history. Officially, Mormon polygamy is now a
quandary for heaven. But California bloggers speculate that the church's
support is really a ploy to legalize polygamy. After all, the thinking
goes, the initiative language says "only marriage between a man and a
woman is valid or recognized in California." But what about one man and
two women?
On the other side, a whisper campaign speculates that if the
initiative fails, church elders will be forced to marry gay couples in the
temples. Others bring up the faith's embarrassingly tardy decision to give
black men the priesthood and marry interracial couples. This scrutiny is
the price of leading the campaign against gay marriage.
Apostle Dallin H. Oaks rejects the notion that the church's history of
polygamy conflicts with its judgment of homosexuality. Many 19th century
Mormons, he says in a 2006 interview on the church's Web site, were
reluctant to live polygamy.
When a new revelation ended the practice, "I think the majority were
greatly relieved and glad to get back into the mainstream of Western
civilization," Oaks says. "If you start with the assumption of continuing
revelation, on which this church is founded, then you can understand that
there is no irony in this."
But that still seems to leave the door open. If polygamy can end with
a revelation, wonders Washington Post columnist David Waters, what about
Mormon opposition to gay marriage?
Given the LDS Church's reliance on procreation theology - the role of
the traditional family in salvation - Gordon says that's unlikely.
"There's an awful lot of theology involved - the centrality of the
family and the ways families are created and perpetuated," she says. "It
seems a significant hurdle."
If anything, the church may be left behind as other conservative
congregations soften and adapt.
Affirmation assistant executive director David Melson says the church
has done damage to its own members and its reputation. "Win or lose, the
actions of the church over the past 90 days will result in damage to the
LDS Church in California and beyond from which it may take a generation or
longer to recover," he says.
The ERA failed. But feminists still went to work.
-----------------------------------------------------
Seeya at the polls, Moscow.
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
"We're a town of about 23,000 with 10,000 college students. The college
students are not very active in local elections (thank goodness!)."
- Dale Courtney (March 28, 2007)
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
http://www.fsr.com/
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list