[Vision2020] Gitmo

[Donovan Arnold]

Chas,
 
"An invasion and an attack are different things, and Tom specified an
invasion."
 
True, but the clause he quoted stated attack or invasion. I think the meaning of the clause is clear except to lawyers that like to argue and win impossible positions to advance their career. 
 
I agree we should have attacked Saudi Arabia, along with Afghanistan, and left Iraq contained as it was. 
 
Best Regards,
 
Donovan 

--- On Wed, 6/18/08, Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Gitmo
To: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Cc: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>, "Andreas Schou" <ophite at gmail.com>, vision2020 at moscow.com, "Tom Hansen" <idahotom at hotmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 7:44 PM

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 19:26, Donovan Arnold
<donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> What did you call 9/11? A welcoming party?

> Sorry, but if the killing of 3,000 innocent Americans, and attacks and
> attempted attacks on the the Pentagon, the White House, the Capitol, and
the
> World Trade Center, is not an attack, please define to what you would
> consider an attack?

An invasion and an attack are different things, and Tom specified an
invasion.  We have not been invaded by a foreign power, we have been
attacked by terrorists.  Based on the nationality and the financing of
the attack, our own terrorist response should have been against Saudi
Arabia, not Iraq.

Chas


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080618/f916f234/attachment.html