[Vision2020] Coulter's Dream - from CNN

[g. crabtree]

It's a doggone good thing you don't make your living as a gambling man, Mr. 
Campbell. I am sorry to disappoint you and your ladies aid society but 
nothing in the post you reference was given to me by anyone else. It seems 
to me to be another example of your oversized ego to imagine that there is a 
group devoted to making you look foolish when it's clear that you have the 
situation so well in hand.

Of course, I have cross posted from the right mind site but I'm fairly sure 
I have cited it each time. Dale (nor any flavor of Doug) has no 
responsibility for anything that I have written to you, ever. It would seem 
that you and your associates ongoing obsession is spilling over into 
paranoia. And might I mention that the assertion coming from a conspiracy 
theorist who, along with her fellow "researcher," keeps shoe boxes of files 
on their pet infatuation is an irony to amusing to ignore.

Regarding the supposed error I made in the use of the phrase "embracing 
abortion," I'm sorry if I received the wrong impression from all the times 
you have trotted out your "clear harms to clear people" defense of the 
practice. I'd dive back into the archives and provide reference for why I 
may have reached the conclusion that I did but, it seems clear that being 
held accountable for what you say makes you testy. Today I'll refrain.

This most recent rant on your part seems to center on the fact I made a 
statement concerning your "ambiguous religious disposition." You take 
exception and in defense state " I don’t like to talk about the specifics of 
my religious beliefs. I speak in vague generalities. The comments were 
vague..." When I go to Thesaurus.com the very first entry under "vague" is 
ambiguous. With this being the case, just exactly what is it that has you 
going off on yet another of your incoherent and all too frequent  rants?

In closing let me say that I find it quite odd and faintly disturbing that 
your concern over me is so all consuming that you would use it to influence 
your voting decisions. Maybe you could read up and attend a candidates forum 
or two? I'm fairly sure that my inconsequential blathering here on the V 
doesn't quite make the candidates radar screen.

g



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Campbell" <joekc at adelphia.net>
To: "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>
Cc: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>; <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Coulter's Dream - from CNN


Gary: “So when YOUR incongruous comments are pointed out, I'M a jackass.”

No. You can’t blame your jackassedness on my incongruous comments.

Gary: “I suppose no matter what happens in your life that's not quite to 
your liking it will
be someone else that's at fault.”

No. I never said this. If you can point out where I said this I’d appreciate 
it. You seem to
have access to a lot of my quotes and lots of time on your hands.

Gary: “I fail to see how supporting my contentions by providing reference to 
your actual
words equals making fun of your religious beliefs. By the way, I don't 
collect your
quotes, the V2020 archive does. If you are embarrassed by what you have said 
in the past
I don't see how I can be held accountable. Providing the full quote and a 
reference to
where it can be found is pretty much the exact opposite of quoting out of 
context.”

I stand by my words. You’re MISSING THE POINT. The point is, you’re a 
jackass and
I’m not going to take the trouble to explain my views any further since you 
don’t really
want to understand them. You want to ridicule them.

Also, did you find the quotes, or did someone give them to you? I bet you 
won’t answer
this question! Have you ever published any information sent to you by a 
member of
Christ Church who’s first initial is ‘D’?

Gary: “I don't believe that pointing out inconsistency is the same as 
ridicule …”

Of course it is not. But you didn’t point out an inconsistency. You just 
strung together a
bunch of quotes that Doug, or Dale, or Doug FED YOU and supposed that that 
would do
the trick. But you don’t even understand the quotes. Which is why you can’t 
spot an
inconsistency. If I’m wrong, do it.

As I said in recent posts, I don’t like to talk about the specifics of my 
religious beliefs. I
speak in vague generalities. The comments were vague – such is the nature of 
my
comments. I’d like to know why you think they are inconsistent – but you can’t 
say since
this was not YOUR idea. Again, prove me wrong and explain the inconsistency.

Gary: “… so, here's a challenge for you. Using the same technique, why don't 
you back
up your assertion that I ‘make fun of your religious beliefs.’ Providing 
actual examples of
my dastardly ways would doubtless go quite a bit further than your 
unsubstantiated whining.”

You claimed that I “embrace abortion” and this is a lie. Where have I said 
this? I’ve said
the opposite on numerous occasions. But you persist in this lie because you 
are a jackass.

I am using you as a litmus test for the coming election. I will ask each 
candidate, “Do you
think Gary Crabtree is a jackass”? If they say ‘No,’ I’m not voting for 
them.