[Vision2020] Why is this not treason?

[Sunil Ramalingam]

Pat,

Which program are you referring to?

Sunil


>From: "Pat Kraut" <pkraut at moscow.com>
>To: "vision2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Why is this not treason?
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:26:51 -0800
>
>Why is it not treason for the NYT to publish the ways the CIA is tracking 
>by cell phone so that they stop using them and we cannot find terrorists?? 
>Or a variety of other things that have happened recently to jeopardize our 
>safety??
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: keely emerinemix
>   To: Art Deco ; Vision 2020
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 5:13 PM
>   Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Why is this not treason?
>
>
>   Because . . . I don't know . . . we've re-defined "treason" as "not 
>doing what Cheney and Bush, et al, say we should do to support the troops"? 
>  And "asking hard questions of the incompetents in office," as well as 
>"buying Dixie Chicks CDs."
>
>   This is certainly an outrage, very likely treasonous, and won't be 
>prosecuted as such because it's business, and business is the elixir of the 
>right.
>
>   keely
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     From: deco at moscow.com
>     To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>     Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:49:58 -0700
>     Subject: [Vision2020] Why is this not treason?
>
>
>     Why are not the acts described below treason?  Why have not the 
>responsible parties been tried for treason?  Instead the company has been 
>reward with a new contract with $50 of the $100 million applied in payment 
>of that contract.
>
>     Perhaps all you V 2020 clear-headed Bush Administration Apologist can 
>explain?
>
>     W.
>
>     Defense contractor admits sending classified materials overseas, will 
>pay $100 million penalty
>     WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The leading manufacturer of night vision gear for 
>the Defense Department has admitted sending classified materials overseas 
>and will pay a $100 million penalty, according to federal prosecutors, who 
>say the actions of ITT Corp. have jeopardized the security of U.S. 
>soldiers.
>     ITT, based in Roanoke, Va., exported classified or sensitive technical 
>data to China, Singapore and Britain without having obtained authorization 
>from the United States, prosecutors said.
>     The conviction is the first involving a major defense contractor 
>violating the Arms Export Control Act, prosecutors said.
>     Saying that American soldiers are "the principal victims of ITT's 
>crimes," U.S. Attorney John Brownlee said he has structured the $100 
>million penalty so that half of the money is spent by ITT to develop a 
>next-generation night vision system and "ensure that our soldiers have the 
>best night vision equipment in the world." --From CNN Producer Mike M. 
>Ahlers (Posted 12:36 p.m.)
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   i'm making a difference. Make every IM count for the cause of your 
>choice. Join now!
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   =======================================================
>    List services made available by First Step Internet,
>    serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                  http://www.fsr.net
>             mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>   =======================================================
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   No virus found in this incoming message.
>   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>   Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.18/734 - Release Date: 3/26/07 
>2:31 PM


>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================