[Vision2020] John Dickinson replacement scenarios
J Ford
privatejf32 at hotmail.com
Fri Feb 23 13:05:13 PST 2007
The only issue that looms heavily before this reasoning is the fact that the
people in John's District will be left unrepresented for a great deal of
time. We have over 9 months left in this year and those people need to feel
like their views and issues are represented on the Council and/or that they
have a representative they can call and talk to.
I still think the people should be allowed to put in there the person THEY
want and not have the Mayor just appoint someone.
J :]
>From: jeanlivingston <jeanlivingston at turbonet.com>
>Reply-To: jeanlivingston <jeanlivingston at turbonet.com>
>To: "Dan Carscallen" <areaman at moscow.com>, <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>Subject: [Vision2020] John Dickinson replacement scenarios
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:43:02 -0800
>
>My sense of the situation with John Dickinson's seat on Council is that the
>legal eagles that have looked at the issue find no indisputable basis or
>provision for replacing John, unless he is declared dead. That would
>easily be done if there were a body found, but without a dead body or a
>live one with the ability to resign as Jack Hll did, the situation is an
>anomaly that does not seem to have a ready answer. There really seems to
>be no prescribed basis for a replacement in this situation. One
>possibility might be to file a declaratory judgemnt action in court and try
>to prove that the City can't function unless the court orders a
>replacement. But it is not at all clear that the City cannot function
>without John's presence. Dan's point about the increased likelihoood of a
>quorum problem without replacing the "vacant" spot might provde such a
>basis, but when you add in the debatable nature of that argument, (i.e.,
>generally business can be conducted), plus the time and !
> expense
>of litigating the issue in court, maybe the powers that be have decided
>that it is better to continue to just "wait and see."
>
>Bruce Livingston
>
>
>-----Original message-----
>From: "Dan Carscallen" areaman at moscow.com
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:51:08 -0800
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] vision 2020 proposal
>
> > Tom says:
> > "If John Dickinson's term expires in December of this year, I assume
> > then that there is an election scheduled for this November? If so,
> > wouldn't it be more prudent to simply let it remain vacant until
> > somebody is elected to fill it?"
> >
> > Yes, elections are again this November. And that may be Mayor Chaney's
> > plan--just leave it open for the next 10 months. I don't know if she
> > can be "forced" to fill the position, but if we have situations again
> > where two council members get sick, with an appointment we'd still have
> > a quorum. Right now, only one council member can be absent at a time
> > and still allow the council to do the city's business.
> >
> > Not that it's that big a deal, but it might be to some people.
> >
> > DC
> >
> >
> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > http://www.fsr.net
> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
>
>=======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================
_________________________________________________________________
The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by Experian.
http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=660600&bcd=EMAILFOOTERAVERAGE
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list