[Vision2020] Godwin's Law Strikes Again!
Tom Hansen
thansen at moscow.com
Thu Feb 8 16:04:32 PST 2007
ToeKnee stated:
"Therefore, Sunil, if an African American had be-headed Daniel Pearle, and
another had criticised the killer as a miserable nigger, the other would be
guilty of using a term most folks would regard as referencing the
perpetrator's race. However, for reasons stated above, the other could
actually harbor NO RACIAL intent whatsoever, but himself be referencing the
perp's atrocious behavior."
That's just it, TK. The purpose in the use of the N-word in your example
was solely for "referencing the perpetrator's race" NOT the perpetrator's
deed.
If you feel that I am mistaken, and the use of the N-word were strictly in
reference to the deed, please relate to us what you identify as "N-word" [I,
personally, refuse to use the word] behavior.
Likewise, if RAGHEAD is strictly an attribute of specific behavior, to what
behavior would you attribute "raghead"?
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Tony
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 3:49 PM
To: david sarff
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Godwin's Law Strikes Again!
A critical distinction: One can use a term others regard as inflamatory
toward a race of people, without himself intending to cast aspersions on
that group as a whole. Perhaps one finds the bombing of woman and children
as well as the be-heading of terrified innocent captives abhorant, and finds
that such perpetrators invariably wear head scarves. It is not entirely
inconcievable that he might then use the term RAGHEAD in reference to these
beasts who kill good people and kids, not in reference to their race, but
out of a justified outrage over their BEHAVIOR. Such a scenario will
frequently cause those hearing such commentary to conclude the
writer/speaker is racist, ignorant as they are of his specific, non-racial,
rather, behavioral based criticism.
Therefore, Sunil, if an African American had be-headed Daniel Pearle, and
another had criticised the killer as a miserable nigger, the other would be
guilty of using a term most folks would regard as referencing the
perpetrator's race. However, for reasons stated above, the other could
actually harbor NO RACIAL intent whatsoever, but himself be referencing the
perp's atrocious behavior.
Now, Sunil, you have the information you need to avoid making anymore
erroneous postings as to my motives.
Cheers, -T
----- Original Message -----
From: "david sarff" <davesway at hotmail.com>
To: <jampot at adelphia.net>; <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Godwin's Law Strikes Again!
>
>>Hi Gary,
> It seems to me there is a difference between cultivating hate and
> expressing
> situational anger. Cultivating kindness, a higher order art. In my opinion
> a
> better route to an improved humanity. Not easy for a lot of us.
> I don't see you as a hate cultivator, in fact it seems you might even be
> trying to make efforts against it in concentrated areas.
> In this situation and others similar to it, I think you miss-measured
> Sue's
> reaction. It was situational in reaction to a clear practitioner of hate
> cultivation. Can she do better, you bet. Your knowing that, taking the
> grain
> of truth in her grain of fault and hyper-inflating it, is a bully's
> support
> group method. This technique is not a strength for anybody.
> I agree with Sunil's response, but in light of your effort here, wonder if
> you might be amenable to exploring your examples a bit.
> Recently, comedian Michael Richards made a lot of trouble for himself
> using
> the N word. I suspect you are familiar with that news line. Do you think
> Richard made a forgivable mistake? Is there something there that he needs
> to
> remediate within himself?
> Dave
>
>
>>Gary,
>>
>>So if an African-American killed the same person in the manner you
>>describe,
>>the statement "That miserable nigger just cut the head off of a American
>>non-combatant," would not be racist?
>>
>>You're right, I don't like or agree with your rationale.
>>
>>I think it's a mistake to link emotion with the use of racist language or
>>attitudes. Racist decisions and statements are easily made in the absence
>>of emotion; I think they're the results of attitudes developed over a
>>lifetime and ingrained in cultures and individual people. I don't think
>>any
>>particular 'race' or group has a monopoly on racism. I know I've often
>>heard racist statements expresses as casually as a request for a drink of
>>water. There's no requirement for actions as you suggest; statements
>>express one's views quite effectively.
>>
>>Sunil
>>
>>
>> >From: "g. crabtree" <jampot at adelphia.net>
>> >To: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>> >CC: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Godwin's Law Strikes Again!
>> >Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:12:39 -0800
>> >
>> >Well Sunil, since you insist on trying to chase me out onto a thin limb,
>> >I'll give you my take on comments such as the one you refer to. You
>> >won't
>> >like or agree with it, I suspect, but here goes. Please bare in mind
>> >that
>>I
>> >speak for myself and not anyone else to who you might attribute a lack
>> >of
>> >sensitivity.
>> >
>> >When someone makes a remark like "All ragheads are vermin and have no
>>right
>> >to live" it is inexcusably racist and deserves to be denounced at every
>> >possible turn.
>> >
>> >When someone says "That miserable raghead just cut the head off of a
>> >American non-combatant," it is a minor lapse of manner(s) or tact.
>> >Unfortunate but, forgivable. Not, in my opinion, an indication of racism
>> >per se.
>> >
>> >In the first you are calmly stating your contemptible and unsupportable
>> >opinion of a large group/race of people. In the second you are
>> >expressing
>> >your anger and frustration at an individual or small group of proven
>> >evil
>> >doers with language that is intemperate and poorly chosen.
>> >
>> >Racism is, in my opinion, demonstrated by actions. It is hinted at,
>> >sometimes incorrectly, by individual words.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >I hope that this does not change your opinion of my fitness as company
>> >on
>> >the list.
>> >
>> >g
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>> >Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:31 PM
>> >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Godwin's Law Strikes Again!
>> >
>> >
>> > > Gary,
>> > >
>> > > Are racist slurs minor lapses of manner or tact?
>> > >
>> > > I hope this question isn't considered trash talk, or 'self righteous,
>> >self
>> > > satisfied, school yard sputtering,' though you may well consider me
>> > > an
>> > > additional player; happy to have you as company on that list.
>> > >
>> > > Sunil
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>From: "g. crabtree" <jampot at adelphia.net>
>> > >>To: <debismith at moscow.com>, <suehovey at moscow.com>,
>> ><vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> > >>CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
>> > >>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Godwin's Law Strikes Again!
>> > >>Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:07:27 -0800
>> > >>
>> > >>Extremely interesting. Should someone from the mildly conservative
>>side
>> >of
>> > >>the fence have a minor lapse of manners or tact, the squealing and
>> > >>castigation rises to a level at which our canine friends experience
>> > >>profound and lasting aural pain.
>> > >>
>> > >>But on the other hand it's OK to demean the offender with a level of
>> > >>calumny several orders of magnitude greater then anything originally
>> >said.
>> > >>I mean really, when you feel you have to resort to not so subtly
>>calling
>> > >>someone's mother a bitch along with the silly BS in the post to which
>> >I'm
>> > >>responding, you really have to wonder If Ms. Hovey, Ms. R-S, Mr. Fox,
>> >and
>> > >>the rest of the usual suspects have any sense of irony at all. Double
>> > >>standard risen to the power of hypocritical joke. What's even funnier
>>is
>> > >>that this communication will likely raise the trash talk to the next
>> >level
>> > >>as well as spread it to additional players. Who needs comedy central
>> >when
>> > >>we've got the V.
>> > >>
>> > >>Commence self righteous, self satisfied, school yard sputtering,
>> > >>g
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > =======================================================
>> > > List services made available by First Step Internet,
>> > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>> > > http://www.fsr.net
>> > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> > > =======================================================
>> > >
>>
>>
>>=======================================================
>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>> http://www.fsr.net
>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>=======================================================
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Check out all that glitters with the MSN Entertainment Guide to the
> Academy
> AwardsR http://movies.msn.com/movies/oscars2007/?icid=ncoscartagline2
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list