[Vision2020] "The Final Solution" by Voting Yes on Feb. 6
Dan Carscallen
areaman at moscow.com
Sat Feb 3 12:39:35 PST 2007
Donovan says:
"You want to take away the home of the elderly, without providing them
another home in the community"
uh, I'm pretty sure the building (except for the Gritman-run pool) has
been a home to no one since the end of the year. Not a solid argument,
pard. And using the "Final Solution" tag is a little tasteless. Just
because you have heartburn against Gritman doesn't make it a bad plan.
Mind you, I'm not sure this is the best plan, but I haven't seen a
better one that keeps this property somewhat in the public interest.
I'm not saying I'm against the sale and the removal of the reversionary
clause, but I honestly wish there was more time for Gritman to give the
community a solid idea as to what they'd like to do.
If Gritman wasn't involved, I think this would be dead in the water.
It's going to be close.
Hoping for the best possible outcome,
DC
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list