[Vision2020] Craig's official statement

Joe Campbell joekc at adelphia.net
Tue Aug 28 14:37:49 PDT 2007


Roger,

That Craig merely touched someone else's foot seems to go against the 
information in the police report that Tom posted, as well as information on the 
CNN website found here:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/28/craig.arrest/index.html

Tell me, why would they charge Craig for "lewd conduct" if all he did was 
touch another man's foot with his own foot? Why would Craig -- someone with 
a law degree -- plead guilty if this is all that happened? It doesn't add up.

Notice that on the CNN website it says: "A police officer who arrested him 
June 11 said Craig peered through a crack in a restroom stall door for two 
minutes and made gestures suggesting to the officer he wanted to engage in 
'lewd conduct.' ... 'Craig would look down at his hands, "fidget" with his 
fingers, and then look through the crack into my stall again,' Karsnia wrote in 
documents accompanying the arrest report."

Tell me, do you give Michael Vick the benefit of the doubt? Do you say, "Well, 
he just plead guilty in order to save himself some trouble. That doesn't mean 
he is guilty of any crime." Or do you take his case for what it is, i.e., a 
genuine admission of guilt. And if you treat Vick differently, why?

--
Joe Campbell

---- lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote: 

=============
No I have not followed every vote by every Congressman. I think people tend to look at ssues that they are the most interested in. In regard to the charge against Craig- I don't thing that touching someone's foot is anything to get too excited over. However if had had been me and there wasn't any tissue in the stall, I would have simply said "Can you hand me some toilet paper"
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: "Sue Hovey" suehovey at moscow.com
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:45:17 -0700
To: "lfalen" lfalen at turbonet.com,  "Paul Rumelhart" godshatter at yahoo.com, "Joe Campbell" joekc at adelphia.net
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Craig's official statement

> Folks who don't know where Craig stands on sexuality haven't been following 
> his senatorial career.
> 
> Sue Hovey
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "lfalen" <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> To: "Paul Rumelhart" <godshatter at yahoo.com>; "Joe Campbell" 
> <joekc at adelphia.net>
> Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Craig's official statement
> 
> 
> > My sentiments also. I don't know where Craig stands on sexuality. Joe. 
> > maybe you could let us know were the hypocrisy is?
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: Paul Rumelhart godshatter at yahoo.com
> > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:25:26 -0700
> > To: Joe Campbell joekc at adelphia.net
> > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Craig's official statement
> >
> >> Sure, be my guest.
> >>
> >> You're welcome.
> >>
> >> Is he actively anti-homosexual or something?  Despite the fact that he
> >> gave me a nomination to the Air Force Academy in 1984 (which turned me
> >> down) I haven't really followed his career that much.
> >>
> >> I'm just saying that I'd hate to be in that situation and not actually
> >> be guilty.  Tapping your right foot.  Who knew?  I might also be tempted
> >> to just pay the damn fine and hope nobody notices, too.
> >>
> >> I do know I plan to keep both feet solidly on the floor for the duration
> >> next time I'm in an airport restroom.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> Joe Campbell wrote:
> >> > Paul,
> >> >
> >> > You're not really that naive, are you? How about hypocrisy? Can we 
> >> > accuse him of that?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Joe Campbell
> >> >
> >> > --------------------
> >> >
> >> > The article I read in the Washington Post said that he had tapped the
> >> > foot of the person in the stall next him and reached under the
> >> > partition. Naive to ways of the dance of restroom stall courtship and
> >> > etiquette, I probably would have handed him some toilet paper blithely
> >> > assuming that his dispenser was empty.
> >> >
> >> > I haven't yet read the articles linked to earlier - so it's possible it
> >> > was more than that. But given what the Post said, I can't really accuse
> >> > him of much myself.
> >> >
> >> > Paul
> >> >
> >> > =======================================================
> >> >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >> >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >> >                http://www.fsr.net
> >> >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >> > =======================================================
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> =======================================================
> >>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >>                http://www.fsr.net
> >>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >> =======================================================
> >
> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >               http://www.fsr.net
> >          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
> > 
> 



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list