[Vision2020] Trinity Festival protest

[g. crabtree]

I think it's evident that you have a weak argument when the best you can 
come up with is a link that is little more then a headline and a scant 
paragraph.

Forced? I am not in favor of forcing anyone to do anything including the 
GSA. I just think that if their mission is as stated they are not living up 
to it.

As to the fraternity, is it privately funded and on private property? If so 
I agree with their desire to remain exclusively Christian. The same as I 
would think that a group of gays and/or lesbians should be able to. I am 
guessing that almost all public universities will look far more favorably on 
the later group and afford them greater courtesy.

g
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andreas Schou" <ophite at gmail.com>
To: "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>
Cc: "Joe Campbell" <joekc at adelphia.net>; <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Trinity Festival protest


>> Two standards? Yes for two distinctly different situations.
>
> Oh, I see, Gary. So, for instance, you would be in favor of this
> Christian fraternity being forced to admit Jews, Muslims, atheists, et
> al.
>
> http://chronicle.com/news/article/2666/christian-fraternity-sues-u-of-florida-over-denial-of-recognition
>
> Right? Because that's what would be consistent, right?
>
> -- ACS
>