[Vision2020] Joe LIKES Bananas

J Ford privatejf32 at hotmail.com
Tue Sep 12 12:28:54 PDT 2006 

No, it is the actual disdain you show for those of us out here trying to 
exact changes or justice that we disagree with.  It is an obvious tactic for 
you guys to use the sports talk as a means to distract and show 
contempt...something learned at the knee (or some other part) of Dougie.  
Problem is, we all caught on fast and it doesnae work.

False indignation doesnae either.


J  :]





>From: "David Williams" <davidwilliams365 at hotmail.com>
>To: kjajmix1 at msn.com, vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Joe LIKES Bananas
>Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:46:04 -0400
>
>Whoa there.  Why does everyone always have to get all nasty up in here??
>You're obviously annoyed, but for why??  Correct me if I'm wrong, but
>there's plenty of cyberspace for all of us.  I also don't remember anytime
>where the baseball thread interfered with the other topics here on the viz.
>So why the tightly tied shoe laces??  C'mon, you guys tear other people to
>pieces all day long here, and you read the riot act to a guy for a little
>bit of baseball trivia??  Sheesh...
>
>
> >From: "keely emerinemix" <kjajmix1 at msn.com>
> >To: deaconblues42 at gmail.com, joekc at adelphia.net
> >CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
> >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Joe LIKES Bananas
> >Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:40:02 -0700
> >
> >You see, Deacon, all of this, while somewhat well-written and certainly
> >better punctuated than most missives from your buddies at the fieldhouse,
> >begs the question -- why do you insist on what could only be politely
> >described as "Joe 'n sports spam" when the rest of us are discussing 
>things
> >that have nothing to do with sports.
> >
> >Granted, "Joe" is a far more common name than, say, "Deacon" or "Keely,"
> >but
> >if people started scattering utterly irrelevant factoids about Deacon 
>Jones
> >or Keely Smith throughout the forum, I'm sure you and I would figure out
> >that it's about us.
> >
> >I don't buy that you just have a need to spew sports crap out of your
> >keyboard and hope only to have an eager audience in Visionland.  Here's a
> >hint about what I do think:  see if there's a sports team somewhere 
>called
> >the Skylarks.  I'm sure it'll ring a bell.
> >
> >You and the other wee little men of the Kirk never cease to amaze me, but
> >I'm about at the end of my quotient of annoyance for your style of
> >rollicking good times.  Grow up and wade into the fray with honesty, or
> >kick
> >back with an oatmeal stout and read "Who's Who In Baseball" 'til your 
>eyes
> >cross.  But drop the Eddie Haskell "golly, Mr. Cleaver" bit.  You lack 
>the
> >winsomeness to pull it off.
> >
> >keely
> >
> >keely
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >From: "Deacon James" <deaconblues42 at gmail.com>
> >To: "Joe Campbell" <joekc at adelphia.net>
> >CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
> >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Joe LIKES Bananas
> >Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:12:18 -0700
> >
> >Joe,
> >
> >Neither of those Joes was referring to you. Go back and read more than 
>the
> >subject. Both of those guys had been long done with baseball before you
> >were
> >even a glimmer in your Ph.D.'s eye.
> >
> >The first was about Joseph Earl Campbell, who only played in one major
> >league game (May 3, 1967), but struck out in every one of his at-bats.
> >Hence
> >the title, "Joe Campbell Strikes Out". Maybe I should have been more
> >specific and included the middle name. After all, Joseph Earl Campbell is
> >most certainly not you.
> >
> >The second was about Joseph Benes, whom his teammates nicknamed 
>"Bananas",
> >and who played in 1931. That is where the subject came from. I was going 
>to
> >say "Joe Is Bananas", but I thought it was funnier to say that this guy
> >(who
> >is most certainly NOT you) was going crazy. Obviously there was 
>confusion;
> >perhaps I should have been more specific and included the last name, but 
>I
> >thought that including his nickname -- what he is most known for -- would
> >have been enough.
> >
> >However, you're right. Nobody buys it when you just play dumb. As you put
> >it, "We can all see right through that crap." When I think that, "It's 
>all
> >about the code" and "It's a biased, pro-Walmart presentation (but I'm not
> >going to tell you why)" inexplicably pop into my head.
> >
> >I still don't know where all of the "snotty, rude, insulting remarks made
> >toward liberals" are to be found, or why I deserved a "He started it", 
>but
> >it's OK. I've come to realize that when you get worked up thinking your
> >pride is under fire, you say things you don't really mean.
> >
> >And really, even if I were implying that you strike out or are going 
>crazy
> >(which, of course, I most certainly wasn't), you would think that a grown
> >man, especially one as educated and prestigious as yourself, could handle 
>a
> >bit of ribbing.
> >
> >All in good fun,
> >
> >Deacon
> >
> >On 9/11/06, Joe Campbell <joekc at adelphia.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >Deacon, in all due respect, this post only makes me believe that those
> > >nasty rumors floating around town that Kirkers have no problem lying to
> > >non-Kirkers are true.
> > >
> > >Did you not post a message awhile back with the heading "Joe Campbell
> > >strikes out"? Did you not follow that with the recent post -- "Joe goes
> > >bananas" -- which happened also to follow a post by me that was 
>critical
> >of
> > >NSA? It is almost as if you actually believe that those silly 
>rhetorical
> > >techniques that you learned at school will work here, outside in the 
>real
> > >world. They don't. We can all see right through that crap.
> > >
> > >I'm not upset about any of this. I'm just illustrating what happens 
>when
> > >we play these same childish games. None of these posts are a product of
> >any
> > >anger on my part. It is all just fun and games, CC-style. If you can't
> >beat
> > >them, join them. Right?
> > >
> > >If you want me to treat you with respect, you'll have to return the
> >favor.
> > >And that will begin with an apology and end with your not so cleverly
> > >veiled
> > >insults. Let's just talk about the issues and leave it at that.
> > >
> > >Best, Joe
> > >
> > >---- Deacon James <deaconblues42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >=============
> > >Joe,
> > >
> > >I still don't know what you are talking about. Every post you make is a
> > >non
> > >sequitur. I don't know why you're so upset. Take a chill-pill, man.
> > >
> > >First of all, I'm not even sure what issue I was first to bring up.
> >Shoot,
> > >all I know is that you start talking about fannies, and then J.
> > >Woolfinford
> > >starts talking about particular people's posteriors, and before you 
>know
> > >it,
> > >you're ready to start handing someone one in the eye. That escalated
> > >really
> > >quickly.
> > >
> > >Second, I don't know where all of the "snotty, rude, insulting remarks
> > >made
> > >toward liberals" are to be found. I don't think there's anything to get
> > >worked up about. I don't know, though. Maybe you've just been having a
> > >rough
> > >time a work or something?
> > >
> > >Lastly, I know that you can resort to adolescent name-calling, but I'd
> > >like
> > >to ask you not to. It's not becoming of you. You're better than this,
> >Joe.
> > >
> > >Hope that helps, buddy. Let me know if there's anything I can do for 
>you.
> > >
> > >Take care,
> > >
> > >Deacon
> > >
> > >On 9/11/06, Joe Campbell < joekc at adelphia.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Can we keep in mind that Deacon was the first to post on this issue.
> >Is
> > > > your point, David, that when conservatives make snotty, rude,
> >insulting
> > > > remarks toward liberals that that is OK but when liberals return the
> > >favor
> > > > it is not?
> > > >
> > > > I just want to understand what the rules are. You let me know what
> >they
> > > > are and I'll adapt. If you want to have informed discussions about
> > >issues I
> > > > can do that. If you want to resort to adolesent name-calling I can 
>do
> > >that,
> > > > too.
> > > >
> > > > I understand that you think that the rules work differently for all 
>of
> > >you
> > > > then they do for folks like me but that, in a nut-shell, is my major
> > >problem
> > > > with the CC/NSA gang to begin with.
> > > >
> > > > Time for a sports update!
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Joe Campbell
> > > >
> > > > ---- David Williams <davidwilliams365 at hotmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > =============
> > > > Ooohh, a salvo from Joe Campbell.  What a zinger.  Ummmm...  I'd
> > >recommend
> > > > more thought invested next time around.  Looks like someone FINALLY
> >got
> > > > under his skin.  Another victory for the Sports Boyz, or whatever J
> > >calls
> > > > 'em.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: Joe Campbell <joekc at adelphia.net>
> > > > >To: Deacon James <deaconblues42 at gmail.com >
> > > > >CC: viz <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> > > > >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Joe Goes Bananas
> > > > >Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 7:40:23 -0700
> > > > >
> > > > >Man, Deacon, it must take you hours to find references of baseball
> >guys
> > > > >named 'Joe' to make your posts! I mean, it is such an unusual name!
> > > > >
> > > > >Earlier today I googled "Deacon kisses butt" but I didn't come up
> >with
> > > > >anything. I'll keep trying!
> > > > >
> > > > >--
> > > > >Joe Campbell
> > > > >
> > > > >---- Deacon James <deaconblues42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >=============
> > > > >Visionatics,
> > > > >
> > > > >Joe "Bananas" Benes was called up in 1931 by the St. Louis 
>Cardinals.
> > >As
> > > > an
> > > > >infielder (2B, 3B, SS), he had 12 at-bats in a total of 10 games.
> > >During
> > > > >that time, he batted .167 (2 for 12), and had a .955 fielding
> > >percentage.
> > > > >Though Joe Bananas wasn't around to enjoy it, the 1931 Cardinals, 
>led
> > >by
> > > > >outfielder Chick Hafey, went on to win the World Series.
> > > > >
> > > > >Take care,
> > > > >
> > > > >Deacon
> > > > >
> > > > >=======================================================
> > > > >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > > > >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > > > >                http://www.fsr.net
> > > > >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > > >=======================================================
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > =======================================================
> > > > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > > >                 http://www.fsr.net
> > > >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > > =======================================================
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >=======================================================
> >   List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >   serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >                 http://www.fsr.net
> >            mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >=======================================================
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Search from any web page with powerful protection. Get the FREE Windows
> >Live
> >Toolbar Today!   http://get.live.com/toolbar/overview
> >
> >=======================================================
> >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >                http://www.fsr.net
> >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> >=======================================================
>
>
>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
Check the weather nationwide with MSN Search: Try it now!  
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=weather&FORM=WLMTAG

More information about the Vision2020 mailing list