[Vision2020] Proposition 2 and New Saint Andrews

[Matt Decker]

Andreas,

Thanks for the reply. Thanks for the reminding me what Prop 2 is. I myself 
won't assume that the city is responsible for the lack of students, hence no 
lawsuit. Unless your willing to jump on the no parking area bandwagon.

Matt
>From: "Andreas Schou" <ophite at gmail.com>
>To: "Matt Decker" <mattd2107 at hotmail.com>
>CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Proposition 2 and New Saint Andrews
>Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 16:18:50 -0800
>
>On 11/5/06, Matt Decker <mattd2107 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Andreas,
>>
>>Please do explain yourself on this one. Correct me if I am wrong, but 
>>didn't
>>NSA buy the building as of recent.
>
>Prop 2 allows property owners to sue the state or county for
>"regulatory takings" if the amount of money they could be making
>through an illegal use of the property exceeds any posible legal use
>of the property. It's a no-brainer to assert that having more students
>would make more money than having less students; ergo, the City of
>Moscow is taking money from New Saint Andrews. Therefore, the City of
>Moscow should pay the difference.
>
>On the other hand, the hog farm/rendering plant/papermill I intend to
>build on Jackson Street should be quite lucrative.
>
>-- ACS

_________________________________________________________________
Get FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from 
Microsoft Office Live 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/