[Vision2020] ITD workshops today
Dan Carscallen
predator75 at moscow.com
Thu Jan 20 10:58:31 PST 2005
All:
Concerning the ring road/bypass concept, it is that right now: a
concept. It seems to me that a "bypass" would probably be to the west
of Moscow, while the eastern (particularly the northeastern) section of
the ring road would be less a "freeway" style and more a local limited
access road.
Of course, I'm not a spokesman for it by any means, I'm just relaying
some of the information I've gleaned from meetings with the
transportation commission and with the little "show" put on by Walter
Steed and Les MacDonald.
DC
-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Bruce and Jean
Livingston
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 10:41 AM
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] ITD workshops today
There is one more day of meetings, this afternoon and evening regarding
transportation options related to Highway 95. I agree with Mr. Sarff's
comments, below, that the approaches of Hwy 95 to the city of Moscow
will to
a large extent influence or dictate the location of a by-pass (whether
the
by-pass is federally funded or a locally maintained ring road).
In the interests of sound community planning and recognizing that the
Pullman-Moscow communities provide the bulk of transportation demand in
this
area, it has always been my belief that traffic alternatives should
favor a
location between Pullman-Moscow (e.g., the reserved right of way on the
state line through the U of I campus, or across the state line in
extreme
eastern Washington), as opposed to routing traffic east of Moscow. If
we
are to re-route traffic from downtown, a western re-routing should be
provided before an eastern one, in my opinion.
Whatever your opinions, take the opportunity to make them known at the
meetings today or this evening at Eastside Marketplace.
Bruce Livingston
----- Original Message -----
From: "david sarff" <davesway at hotmail.com>
To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 9:10 AM
Subject: [Spam] [Vision2020] ITD workshops today n tomorrow
> The findings of the first Moscow transportation study (out of three
> recommended), regarding a by-pass, are that Moscow does not need a
by-pass
> that meets "federal design" standards. Moscow is about to receive a
> "federally designed" highway from the South. In my mind there are
some
> considerable incongruences in promoting relief of traffic by designing
the
> highway to federal standards and relief of traffic for the city via a
> locally controlled by-pass or Ring Road, or what ever term one chooses
to
> purposely exclude the Fed. If we don't need one, we don't need the
other.
> With a new highway, built to Federal standards, a by-pass likely will
> come, built to these same standards. If the present concept of "ring
road
> system" is put into place before that time, these new approaches of US
95
> into Moscow need increased scrutiny now. The choices for the highway
are
> to go east or west of the present route, or to improve the existing
route.
> Residents need to seriously consider how this forthcoming highway will
tie
> into a future by-pass built to the same standards as the highway. The
> furthest extremes of routing East or West will influence, if not
> altogether lock in, the application of a future outcome. Please come
to
> the workshops for routing US 95 at the eastside marketplace Wed. and
> Thurs. 19th-20th sessions from 1-4 pm and 5:30-8:30 and take part in
the
> decision making process.
>
>
> _____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the
> communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
_____________________________________________________
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list