[Vision2020] Drunks, drugs, and the empathy factor

[David M. Budge]

Joan writes:

"There.  That's it for me.  Mr. Bush's unproven use aside, Dave, are 
we or are we not in general accord on this issue?  Treatment and not 
incarceration.  Stop use with the user and not by bombing poppie fields 
in Afghanistan or coca leaf growers in Columbia?  Stop with the DEA and 
make with the funding for the REHAB."

I never said we were in general accord (although we're much closer than 
you seem to think.)  I said you are in general accord with William F. 
Buckley, Jr, etc., etc.

...and you are.

db

Joan Opyr wrote:

> Dear Dave and other Visionaries:
>  
> About the Bush budget cuts -- it could be that I was thinking not of 
> Mark Solomon's list but of a piece I read in some left-wing rag 
> entitled: Bush Budget Kills Drug-Free Schools Program, Maintains Block 
> Grant.  (Sorry, I didn't copy the URL, but I did print out the 
> article, so it must have made quite an impression on me as I'm 
> generally cheap with the toner.  The journal is called Fighting Back, 
> so that should tell you something about its slant; you're free, if you 
> like, to go ahead now and dismiss it.  I won't take offense.  Hell, I 
> won't know, will I?)  My understanding of the matter, however, is that 
> Bush's 2006 Budget calls for $441 million in funding for the Safe and 
> Drug-Free Schools & Communities Program, a reduction, though not a 
> draconian one; it calls for "level funding" of the nearly $2 
> billion-dollar Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment block grant 
> program; and a $270 million decrease in funding for demand reduction 
> programs.
>  
> To quote that damned liberal rag, Fighting Back:
>
> "After years of sustained, stratospheric budget increases, funding for 
> addiction research would come back to earth under Bush's 2006 plan.  
> The National Institute on Drug Abuse would get a modest $4- million 
> dollar increase to its $1-billion budget, while the $438-million 
> National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism would rise by 
> just $2 million." 
>  
> Does this keep pace with inflation?  Does this keep pace with use?  
> Damned if I know.  I'd need to do a lot more research than I'm willing 
> to do for the sake of fussing with you, Dave Budge.  (It's nothing 
> personal; I have a neck-ache.  Poor ergonomics here at my computer 
> desk.)  I will note however (and I will say a sarcastic hoorah!) that 
> the Bush administration is expanding funding for the Access to 
> Recovery program, which allows individuals to choose faith-based 
> recovery programs like AA, I assume, only with even more God stuff.  
> Will this work?  Is it Constitutional?  Will this sort of rehab get 
> you off of horse and onto the Pauline donkey?  Sorry -- I'm answering 
> your questions with questions again.  I have a bad habit of doing 
> that.  I think it's a Jewish trait; Jesus did it all the time.  Drove 
> his followers crazy.
>  
> Now, Dave, you are quite right to point out that I do not have direct, 
> first-hand, signed affidavit knowledge of George W. Bush's illegal 
> drug use.  I was way too young to get into the Texas version of Studio 
> 54 back when Mr. Bush was in his twenties and thirties.  He's 
> acknowledged that he abused alcohol until he was forty (though he has 
> never admitted to being an alcoholic).  Others -- and who knows how 
> reliable they are -- have attested to his use of other substances.  Mr 
> Doug Wead (what a great name) has come forward with tapes of 
> then-Governor Bush talking implicitly, if not explicitly, about his 
> marijuana use, and discussing his strategy for dealing with questions 
> about other drugs that he may or may not have toked upon.  I suppose I 
> could rely on Kitty Kelley . . . but then I would catch hell, wouldn't 
> I?  The Bushes have neither sued her nor had her assassinated, so I 
> guess that puts her credibility at about 50/50.  Nope -- I can never 
> be 100% sure that Mr. Bush snorted coke.  I am forced to rely not, as 
> you suggest, on Democratic imitators of The Swift Boat Veterans for 
> Truth, but on grotesque hearsay, stories put about by Mr. Bush's old 
> friends and fraternity brothers, Larry Flynt's Penthouse, and the 
> rumors regarding said drug use that have swirled about Texas for the 
> past thirty years.  I have to rely on all of that and my own 
> unverifiable-but-never-let-me-down-before experience and judgment at 
> spotting a user.  That's what tells me that Mr. Bush was a 
> snort-a-roosky.  He had the money, the connections, the time, and the 
> inclination.  Dismiss that if you must, but I'm going with it.  Call 
> it woman's intuition.  Or not. 
>  
> [BTW, if I were Jennifer McFarland, I'd pull the Presidential limo and 
> search it with the sniffer dogs the very next time Mr. Bush drives 
> through Moscow.  You can thank me for the tip later, Jennifer.  When 
> 60 Minutes interviews you, you can plug my book!]
>  
> There.  That's it for me.  Mr. Bush's unproven use aside, Dave, are 
> we or are we not in general accord on this issue?  Treatment and not 
> incarceration.  Stop use with the user and not by bombing poppie 
> fields in Afghanistan or coca leaf growers in Columbia?  Stop with the 
> DEA and make with the funding for the REHAB.
>  
> Joan Opyr/Auntie Establishment
> www.auntie-establishment.com <http://www.auntie-establishment.com>
>  
> PS: If you're a glutton for punishment, Google "Bush Budget 2006" and 
> "drug treatment" and you'll find five thousand sources, opinions, and 
> commentary on what will happen re: treatment versus incarceration over 
> the next four years.  If you're not a glutton for punishment, then 
> please allow me to summarize: it's not good.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : 
> http://explorer.msn.com
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet, 
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>               http://www.fsr.net                       
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20050222/eab6d7f6/attachment-0001.htm