[Vision2020] In Defense of Phil Nisbet

[Donovan Arnold]

"Perhaps Nick can educate Donovan about what a
knowledge claim is.--W. Fox.

Does the course have a lesson not to end a sentence
with "is" or is this knowledge a prerequisite for
entrance?

Donovan J Arnold

--- Art Deco <deco at moscow.com> wrote:

> Perhaps Nick can educate Donovan about what a
> knowledge claim is.
> 
> W.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Donovan Arnold"
> <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
> To: "Nicholas Gier" <ngier at uidaho.edu>;
> <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 7:06 PM
> Subject: [Vision2020] In Defense of Phil Nisbet
> 
> 
> > Visionaries,
> >
> > Phil Nisbet has been offended by Ralph. I think to
> > tell Phil he is wrong about his feelings and Ralph
> is
> > right about Phil's feelings is a fruitless
> endeavor.
> >
> > Usually, when we offend someone we say, sorry, I
> did
> > not mean to offend you. Ralph did not do that, he
> > attempted to justify his offensive behavior by
> saying
> > he knows more about the Bible than Phil.
> >
> > I can tell you now that although Ralph knows 1000
> > times more than I do about the Bible, he has
> already
> > said some things I know to be untrue about
> Catholics.
> > So the fact that he may have made mistakes about
> the
> > Jewish faith would not be surprising.
> >
> > A couple of comments on Dr. Geir's statements.
> >
> > 1) "Ralph has devoted much of his retirement to
> the
> > study of the Bible from a healthy skeptical
> > perspective."
> >
> > Studying the Bible does not equate to knowing the
> > Jewish faith, or any faith for that matter.
> >
> > 2)"He has proved time and time again that
> Christians
> > who claim to know the Bible usually don't know
> what
> > they are talking about."
> >
> > Phil Nisbet is not a Christian. Christians usually
> > study only a small portions of the Bible. So this
> is
> > not surprising. If you are Catholic, like me, you
> are
> > spoon fed portions the Bible.
> >
> >
> > 3) "If Phil could just stop and realize that Ralph
> is
> > talking scholarship"
> >
> > Why is the burden on Phil? Should Ralph not be the
> one
> > that realizes we are not talking scholarship?
> >
> >
> > Faith cannot be studied from a factual
> observational
> > scientific viewpoint. It is entirely an internal
> > relationship with God. You cannot put it in a book
> or
> > debate it. Studying the Bible like the Rosetta
> Stone,
> > in my opinion, is the wrong way of going about it.
> >
> > Donovan J Arnold
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Greetings:
> >
> > I believed that Phil Nisbet has been unnecessarily
> > harsh on my good
> > friend Ralph Nielsen.  Ralph has devoted much of
> his
> > retirement to the
> > study of the Bible from a healthy skeptical
> > perspective.  He has proved
> > time and time again that Christians who claim to
> know
> > the Bible usually
> > don't know what they are talking about.
> >
> > Ralph and I have met devout Jews at scholarly
> > conferences who are
> > completely cool with the phrase "Hebrew Bible" and
> > know how to distinguish a
> > scholarly approach from a believer's approach.
> >
> > I suppose that Phil would not at all like my paper
> > "Hebrew and Buddhist
> > Concepts of Self," which is currently out for
> blind
> > review.  It
> > demonstrates that the Hebrew scriptures as they
> stand
> > (not as they are
> > interpeted by the various schools of Judaism) do
> not
> > support that idea of a
> > substantial or immortal soul.  Phil quotes a
> passage
> > from Ecclesiastes
> > and is unaware of the fact that what returns to
> God is
> > not an immortal
> > soul, but the divine breath that animates all
> life,
> > including animal
> > life. We and the animals return to the dust or a
> > shadowy existence in
> > Sheol.
> >
> > I appreciate the Jewish religious very much
> because it
> > generally does
> > not take scripture literally, and it also takes
> > traditions very
> > seriously.
> >
> > If Phil could just stop and realize that Ralph is
> > talking scholarship
> > and he is talking about the Jewish tradition, this
> > blow up could have
> > been avoided.
> >
> > Nick Gier
> >
> > --- Nicholas Gier <ngier at uidaho.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings:
> >>
> >> I believed that Phil Nisbet has been
> unnecessarily
> >> harsh on my good friend Ralph Nielsen.  Ralph has
> >> devoted much of his retirement to the study of
> the
> >> Bible from a healthy skeptical perspective.  He
> has
> >> proved time and time again that Christians who
> claim
> >> to know the Bible usually don't know what they
> are
> >> talking about.
> >>
> >> Ralph and I have met devout Jews at scholarly
> >> conferences who are completely cool with the
> phrase
> >> "Hebrew Bible" and know how to distinguish a
> >> scholarly approach from a believer's approach.
> >>
> >> I suppose that Phil would not at all like my
> paper
> >> "Hebrew and Buddhist Concepts of Self," which is
> >> currently out for blind review.  It demonstrates
> >> that the Hebrew scriptures as they stand (not as
> >> they are interpeted by the various schools of
> >> Judaism) do not support that idea of a
> substantial
> >> or immortal soul.  Phil quotes a passage from
> >> Ecclesiastes and is unaware of the fact that what
> >> returns to God is not an immortal soul, but the
> >> divine breath that animates all life, including
> >> animal life. We and the animals return to the
> dust
> >> or a shadowy existence in Sheol.
> >>
> >> I appreciate the Jewish religious very much
> because
> >> it generally does not take scripture literally,
> and
> >> it also takes traditions very seriously.
> >>
> >> If Phil could just stop and realize that Ralph is
> >> talking scholarship and he is talking about the
> >> Jewish tradition, this blow up could have been
> >> avoided.
> >>
> >> Nick Gier
> >>
> >>
> >
>
_____________________________________________________
> >>  List services made available by First Step
> >> Internet,
> 
=== message truncated ===


		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs