[Vision2020] Social Security (was: public schools &
indoctrination)
Paul Duffau
pduffau@adelphia.net
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:58:35 -0800
Scott,
First, sorry to take so long to reply...it's that "going to work" issue.
Under the current system, the benefits of Social Security end upon a
recipients death. African-Americans have a significantly higher mortality
rate than other population groups, ie. whites. If two individuals
contribute equal sums to Social Security but one dies before the other, a
disparate impact is realized. When a disparate impact is felt, the courts
have ruled that remedial action must be taken as the result is
discriminatory in practice though not necessarily in intent. If, however,
that individual "owns" his Social Security, then the next generation
receives the assets as part of the inheritance. That would eliminate the
disparate impact.
In short, privatizing Social Security would mean that it is a transferrable
asset unlike the current program which is best described as a Ponzi scheme.
At 07:20 AM 11/13/03 -0800, you wrote:
>Paul,
>
>Please provide more information of how privatization
>of Social Security would create a "transfer of wealth"
>and why this is prohibited under the present system
>and yet allowed under a privatized system.
>
>-Scott