[Vision2020] sexual harassment
Sunil Ramalingam
sunilramalingam@hotmail.com
Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:01:19 -0700
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>Tim,</P>
<P>If there was any merit to the Jones sexual harassment case, there would have been a line of plaintiff's attorneys ready to take it. Because she had no damages, because she was not threatened with job loss or job-related penalties if she didn't accede to Clinton's wishes (assuming arguendo that her allegations were true), there was no case. That's why it was funded by a private group that was willing to put time into an otherwise worthless case.</P></DIV>
<P>If the allegations are true, then Clinton was remarkably crass. What would my reaction be to a Republican (or Democrat) charged with the same thing? Much the same as it was in this case, unless the party charged had been a hypocrites who condemned Clinton for his alleged actions.</P>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>If there's a lesson here, it's that Clinton should have admitted the Lewinsky affair at the beginning; he would have been a lot better off. It's the lying afterwards that sinks you. This is not a lesson the present Administration wants to learn.</P>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>Sunil<BR></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>The new <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMNENUS/2737??PS=">MSN 8:</a> smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* </html>