[Vision2020] uranium denial--GUTLESS DEMOS?
Donovan Arnold
donovanarnold@hotmail.com
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:47:53 -0700
Tim,
First, ever hear of the fifth amendment? Why wasn't that brought up?
Second, There is a big difference between someone lying about getting blown
and someone lying and 6,000 people getting blown up.
If you don't understand the difference between the two, then I don't know
how else to explain it to you.
I believe that Clinton did lie. I think he lied under oath. I think what he
did was wrong and unethical. I also think that asking somebody about sexual
relationships with someone when they are under oath is more unethical unless
it is a murder trial establishing a motive. How many of 50%+ of married men
would lie about an affair. That is why nobody cared. And it is not an
impeachable offense. Spending $23 million to investigate a president for the
sake of trying to find something is ludicrous and unethical when people are
starving.
To answer your other question the order of succession is:
Vice President
Speaker of the House
Senate Pro-tempore
Secretary of State
Secretary of Defense
Attorney General
Secretary of Treasury
Secretary of Interior
Secretary of Agriculture
Secretary of Commerce
Secretary of Labor
Secretary of HHS
Secretary of HUD
Secretary of Transportation
Secretary of Energy
Secretary of Education
Secretary of Veterans' Affairs
Sectary of Homeland Security
After this, Martial Law is declared and the highest ranking military
official takes control.
Donovan J Arnold
>From: Tim Lohrmann <timlohr@yahoo.com>
>To: Donovan Arnold <donovanarnold@hotmail.com>
>CC: vision2020@moscow.com
>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] uranium denial--GUTLESS DEMOS?
>Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 22:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Donovan,
>You wrote:
>
>"Fifth, why didn't the Republicans impeach Lewinsky,
>it was her that did the
>act, not Clinton."
>
>Actually what you imply here, that the impeachment was
>just about Lewinsky is incorrect.
>
>The two adopted articles of impeachment read as
>follows:
>
>1st Article.The president provided perjurious, false
>and misleading testimony to the grand jury regarding
>the Paula Jones case and his relationship with Monica
>Lewinsky.
>
>2nd Article. NOT ADOPTED
>
>3rd Article. The president obstructed justice in an
>effort to delay, impede, cover up and conceal the
>existence of evidence related to the Jones case.
>
>
>While we're discussing it, can you imagine the
>reaction of the supposedly feminist-minded Democrat
>party if a GOP pres. had perjured himself concerning
>of all things A SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAWSUIT in which he
>himself was the defendant?
>
>I can hear it now.
>Oooooh the nerve of that sexist lout. Ahhhh...the
>chutzpah of that chauvinist!! Let's maul that
>malicious misogynist!QQ
>
>BUT, when it was one of their own we heard barely a
>peep of criticism against this fellow who has often
>behaved as if women are little more than chattel for
>his private pleasure. And not only that, committed the
>crime of perjury when he got caught.
>
> NO, all we got from these pillars of profound
>feminist virtue was James Carville's classist comment
>about Paula Jones being "trailer trash," and cries of
>"let's move on."
>
> Gee, I thought feminists considered sexual
>harassment serious business that should be fully
>investigated and litigated so that the rights of
>women, especially women in subordinate employment
>positions, could be protected.
>
> Well they do, as long as one of their buddies necks
>isn't on the line. Oh, and it would help if the
>alleged victim of this harassment is an elite Ivy
>League type--one of them. If she's not terribly
>refined, not too wealthy, and doesn't have many
>connections when the alleged harassment took place,
>well, that's not a big deal.
> Just sweep it under the rug, lie about it, or "MOVE
>ON," right?
> TL
>
>--- Donovan Arnold <donovanarnold@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dale wrote:
> > "Would they impeach CIA Director George Tenet for
> > allowing the uranium claim
> > to be believed by the President? Or do they impeach
> > the President for
> > trusting the information coming from the CIA?"
> >
> > Dale, first, nobody on the planet except you
> > believes that Tenet is really
> > responsible.
> > Second, Tenet did not provide the information alone,
>
> > the British, Cheney,
> > Rice, Rumsfeld, and Powell did.
> > Third, if the president can't even ask a question
> > like "Which African
> > Country?" should he also have control of nuclear
> > weapons?
> > Fourth, if Bush is not responsible for the words
> > coming out of his mouth,
> > who is?
> > Fifth, why didn't the Republicans impeach Lewinsky,
> > it was her that did the
> > act, not Clinton.
> > Finally, if Bush is not responsible for what comes
> > out of his mouth, how can
> > we trust him, they might have been put there by
> > someone else that lied?
> >
> > Donovan J Arnold
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Dale Courtney" <dale@courtneys.us>
> > >To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
> > >Subject: RE: [Vision2020] uranium denial--GUTLESS
> > DEMOS?
> > >Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:54:34 -0700
> > >
> > >Tim wrote:
> > > > Why DOESN'T the Democrat party launch and
> > > > impeachment effort if they think it's warranted?
>
> > >
> > >Would they impeach CIA Director George Tenet for
> > allowing the uranium claim
> > >to be believed by the President?
> > >
> > >Or do they impeach the President for trusting the
> > information coming from
> > >the CIA?
> > >
> > >Confused,
> > >Dale Courtney
> > >Moscow, Idaho
> > >
> >
> >_____________________________________________________
>
> > > List services made available by First Step
> > Internet,
> > > serving the communities of the Palouse since
> > 1994.
> > > http://www.fsr.net
> > > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
> >
> >ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>
> >
> >
>_________________________________________________________________
>
> > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months
>
> > FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> >
> >
>_____________________________________________________
> > List services made available by First Step
> > Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >
> > http://www.fsr.net
> >
> > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
> >
>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>http://sbc.yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963